At 09:43 AM 3/21/2006, you wrote:
transfer papers over the years
It has the same print engine as the II, so I should expect pretty much
the same results.
The LJ-II does not have resolution enhancement, so perhaps it might not
be quite as good on really fine lines (< 10mills), but you are likely to
have issues with very fine details on ANY 300 dpi printer like the
LJ-II/III. That said, I've still done some really hairy fine pitch smd
successfully.
I do experience the standard problem with filling very large contiguous
black areas. No big deal.
carl
--------------------------------------------------------
Henry Carl Ott N2RVQ
http://users.rcn.com/carlott/
--------------------------------------------------------
>Does anybody know if a HP LaserJet Series III use an LJ-III all the time with pretty good success. All different
>would be good for laminating toner transfer ?
transfer papers over the years
It has the same print engine as the II, so I should expect pretty much
the same results.
The LJ-II does not have resolution enhancement, so perhaps it might not
be quite as good on really fine lines (< 10mills), but you are likely to
have issues with very fine details on ANY 300 dpi printer like the
LJ-II/III. That said, I've still done some really hairy fine pitch smd
successfully.
I do experience the standard problem with filling very large contiguous
black areas. No big deal.
carl
--------------------------------------------------------
Henry Carl Ott N2RVQ
http://users.rcn.com/carlott/
--------------------------------------------------------