I believe multiple pressure points might actually be inferior. The reason to use a roller is to ensure every point receives high pressure at some time, with multiple rollers this is not ensured if they are not prefectly parallel. (Extreme: a flat plate can be seen as infinitely many rollers). ST On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:30:12 +0100, fenrir_co <fenrir@...> wrote: > An idea came to me after I sent that message out a few days ago: Built > > a frame out of wood and fill with metal pipes or dowels (I suggest > > metal as they will retain heat better) to create a line of 'rollers' > > like those rolling conveyer belts they have at UPS or such. Make sure > > you the surface area is larger than the board and iron and make sure > > whatever you use close to perfectly round and smooth so it can rotate > > inside the frame. Use bits of laser labels to adhere the transfer > > sheet to the board, and iron it on top of this setup. If you use metal > > pipes, leave the iron on top of them for awhile to heat them up. I am > > thinking face down might work better than face up, but make sure the > > board rolls back and forth across the surface. That way it's like the > > dowel tip from pulsar, but with multiple 'high points of pressure' so > > it's like half of a laminator, and with less chance of the thing > > slipping away. Example: (view with monospace font!)
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: HP Paper Was-Toner transfer - un-even surface theory...
2006-03-08 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.