--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Alan King <alan@...> wrote: >seems rather dumb to not accomodate that lower scale end of the >spectrum in the licensing possibilities, especially when so many of >the free users might move into that range.. Hey again Alan, What I got to thinking later on, was that not only might that be an issue, but with some of us, once we move past the stage of building headphone amps or flashing LED circuits, we may be forced in turn to move past Eagle, and into something else which can accomodate us, even if it involves moving into an unfamiliar, less stable, or less powerful app. I think that with some hobbyists like myself, if I spent enough time learning a competing program, and it fit my needs, I may be unlikely to move 'back' to Eagle, if the time ever came where I could afford it, especially with an underdog app, which may be gaining popularity/features/stability and growing along with me. Again, it makes me feel cheap every time I think of it, but even 200 is much higher than I would feel comfortable paying, while keeping my electronics/PCB goals in perspective with my budget and other expenses. I, personally, would prefer to see a "no commercial use" version with no size or part quantity limitations, but none of the features exclusive to production run work and muti-layer boards, which are likely impossible for DIY'ers. Most of the machine work and milling specifications which it can produce for circuit board houses, is most likely never going to be used here. If I fished through it, I could probably find a hundred other features I could say that about, many of which might make it impossible to use in large scale commercial applications. That might be a key issue to mention to them, as I have considered that offering a fully functioning lower priced version for non-profit and hobbyists, might lead to some less honest users never upgrading after they could afford to. Maybe they should have just spent more time compiling a uniquely limited version, rather than just implementing basic limitations and legal restrictions. BTW- I must have forgotten most of that licensing crap you just stated. Much worse than I remembered, almost "mob like". I guess I just looked at the dimensioning details. -George
Message
Re: New Scematic capture & PCB software
2006-02-14 by soffee83
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.