> While I don't know the orginal poster from a the next guy on the > street, I do share Mike's skepticism on the "I've been dealing > with the limitations of eagle for making pcbs for a few years > now, and finally hit a problem I could not resolve." It is > likely to boil down to one of three options: > > 1. The 'problem' is real but actually tiny, and the OP's idea of an > 'unresolvable' problem takes 5 minutes to figure out with Google. > 2. The 'problem' is imaginary, totally manufactured to stump the > OP's agenda, paid or not. > 3. The near zero % chance of something that doesn't fall into the > two above options. > Hi Alan, nice to meet you, I'm Richard, the OP. The problem falls into section 3. I'm making a PCI-104 board with a lot of high count surface mount parts, and I need at least 4 layers, and probably 6. > > It's one of the least limited programs I've ever used. A bit > obtuse on how to do some things, but that's what Google is for. > And at least when you get past your own 'teething' of how to use > it, it's potential is already largely there. Not some far off > thing you want that may never even be programmed in.. > I've been happily bitching at eagle since sometime in 02, and I agree with your assessment: it's a very capable program. But the hard limits on size and number of layers are hard limits. I did RTFM, and I am posting about kicad because of my own agenda, which is to help other hobbiests overcome problems that have beat me up. Kicad is free ware, I'm not a developer, I am not a seller, I am not associated with it in any manner other than being a user, though I am considering getting involved in the development, if I can ever get the components to all work together in VS2005. Thanks Richard P.S. I do believe in a healthy dose of scepticism, and agree with your list of 3 possible problems, I just always tend to be about 3 sigma, so I get to fall in section 3 most of the time.
Message
Re: New Scematic capture & PCB software
2006-02-14 by rmustakos
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.