----- Original Message ----- From: "brewski922" <brewski@...> To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 7:07 PM Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Toner transfer experiments and a fix for cheap, low-temp laminators >> Why not use the UV exposure technique? It's much simpler and > quicker >> and the results are excellent. >> > > Ben there done that, BACK IN THE MID-70s. My gosh, am I that old. > > Anyway, from what I remember that was a pain. > > 1) Make the PCB artwork. > 2) Print it on paper. > 3) Expose the negative. > 4) Develop the negative. > 5) Place the negative on a photo sensetive PCB, glass on top of that > with a weight to make the negative in direct contact with the PCB. > This has to be done under darkroom lighting. > 6) Expose the PCB to the UV. > 7) Develope the PCB. > 8) Etch the PCB. > 9) Cut to size and drill. > > I realize some of these steps are done in the Toner-Transfer method. > The TT method must be reconized as a homebrew method. > > You are doing this the Twenty-first century way and I for sure don't > know what might be considered the best homebrew way of doing. I would > like to get back into making my own prototype PCBs. I'm sure you are > using one of the better methods. How is the best for me to start > making PCBs? If you look back over my recent posts you will see details of my technique.I simply print 1:1 onto film with an inkjet printer. I can do 8 mil tracks and 0.5 mm lead spacing ICs on single-sided boards without any problems -about the same as the low-cost PCB suppliers like Olimex. Leon --- [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are currently using to read this email. ]
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Toner transfer experiments and a fix for cheap, low-temp laminators
2006-02-07 by Leon Heller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.