--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@...> wrote: > > On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:34:36 +0100, leon_heller > <leon.heller@...> wrote: > > > > > Why not use the UV exposure technique? It's much simpler and quicker > > > > and the results are excellent. > > > > > > Leon > > > If you did't live so far away i'd challenge you to a race ;-) > > As it is, i'll just accept your views as a different opinion.. > > Well, we could have a 3rd party provide a layout image to us both at the > same time and then go for whover is faster providing a photo of the pcb > just put into the etchant, if you are up to the challenge ;-) I terms of actual hands-on time,I'm quite sure UV exposure is quicker. I just have to put the transparency and PCB together into the exposure unit, and switch it on. Although it takes 13 minutes,I can do something else whilst it is 'cooking'. I then take the PCB out and develop it in NaOH - about a minute_ before rinsing and etching. Total time actually working on the PCB is about two minutes. Leon
Message
Re: Toner transfer experiments and a fix for cheap, low-temp laminators
2006-02-07 by leon_heller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.