> What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step? Using 0402 as an example. Here is a picture of a 0402 cap; http://rocky.digikey.com/WebLib/Panasonic/Web%20Photos/ECD-GOE% 20Series.jpg Here is a data sheet; http://www.panasonic.com/industrial/components/pdf/abj0000ce8.pdf Editing with your imported standard reflow layout, you would; 1. Lengthen the solder area as Leon indicated; 2. Shorten the width to just over .5 mm 3. Shorten the pad area beneath the chip so that the contact area on each side of the chip ends where the pad ends under the chip. In other words, for 0402, only about .5 X .2 mm (W X L1 or L2) of the pad is under each side of the chip. 1 above allows for easy soldering and aids heat dissipation. 2 and 3 above allow for quick alignment along X and Y axes. Remember, you'll be hand soldering so a layout pattern that facilitates sutface tension centering is no longer applicable. If heat dissipation requirements, say in the case of a resistor, are near the limit of the device then either stick with the reflow pattern or use a bigger package size with standard pad layout. --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Dave Hylands <dhylands@g...> wrote: > > Hi Derek, > What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step? > > -- > Dave Hylands > Vancouver, BC, Canada > http://www.DaveHylands.com/ >
Message
Re: SMD popular component sizes
2006-01-27 by derekhawkins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.