On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:53:29 +0100, soffee83 <soffee83@...> wrote: > Hey again Stefan and all, > > > I think I do have that same color and type of board as you in some > > single sided stuff I was using. I've got some cheap single sided now > > that's more weird looking, but seems to do quite well. It's a > > totally opaque light beige, sort of a flesh tone, with a fairly tight > > weave of whatever's in it. > > > I'm not sure if I'd try that iron rolling. I'd be afraid of trying to > > get enough heat up through the board bottom to melt what was on the > > paper a few layers away. I saw the acetone thing mentioned a few > > times, but it could have been all for "toner to metal" transfers. I > > also remember one thread with someone who couldn't get any acceptable > > results from it and decided it was "toner dependant". > > > -George (who still hasn't gotten his no-stick Reynolds wrap) The really whitish board stuff is probably FR1, with only one layer of glass and phenolic paper in between. I've got some of this too. I think our "not so transparent" but full glass material is G10 or XPC. Both have the usual 8 layers glass, XPC uses phenolic resin and G10 uses epoxy, but not the same as FR4. I don't think it matters much for homebrew projects, as i usually don't design for my boards to catch fire anyway ;-) It should be possible to identify this via the logo in the middle layer, but i have not had any luck with that yet since it is red, which means FR4, but isn't FR4 at all.... Anyway, what i have found is that the real FR4 i have seems to take the toner badly, especially if you use single-sided stock and try to transfer on the smooth side. ST
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Post-Etch Topside Layout Labeling?
2005-12-08 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.