--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Adam Seychell <a_seychell@y...> wrote: ... > I admit, its nice to see the PCB being etched when using AP. But I don't > like fooling around with heaters/heating, so thats why I prefer a room > temperature etchant. If I had to included the time to heat my tank to > temperature, then it will take me a *lot* longer to etch a board. My tank has a 1 L capacity so it doesn't take very long to heat up with a hacked aquarium heater. I'd estimate 20-30 mins depending on ambient temp. For me, fiddle f*rting with a heater and pump is preferable to fiddle f*rting with chemicals. ;) For others it may be the other way around. It's not wasted time, though. I set up the tank and heater, do the toner transfer and prep the board for etch. By then the tank is just right and away I go. Usually, I batch up multiple boards for a single etch session so its even more efficient. What it boils down is that there are lots of ways of getting the same result with relatively the same level of efficiency. One other thing I haven't seen discussed is the effect of etching speed on pinholing with TT. I think (though have no way to prove it) that pinholing is proportional to etch time. It seems to work out that way. The last batch (the one I mentioned) had almost no pinholing at all. I was very pleased with the result. Even under the microscope, it looked suprisingly clean for TT.
Message
Re: Regenerating CuCl
2005-09-06 by Phil
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.