--- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "Hermann Seib" <hermann@s...> > This seller is "synhouse"... and if you've ever made a trip to > www.synhouse.com, you'll easily recognize this slightly > over-exaggerated, marketing-oriented style :-) Strange - I bought a fully restored Series IIx from John Hill @ Synhouse (as well as many spares and accessories) and he stikes me as one of the very few NON 'over-exaggerated, marketing-oriented' people I've dealt with - IMHO quite definitely one of the hardest working and most honest people in the synth world. The Series II was based around the Quasar microcomputer and basically a cludge with most of the functions implemented in hardware - the Series III is a completely different machine running a very competent realtime operating system with much more power and flexibility. That said, and the point I believe John Hill would have been trying to make - the Series II is more of an esoteric, yet highly musical machine - whereas the Series III is (still) an awesomely competent composition tool, but perhaps slighly less 'musical' as an instrument - because of the way it plays back so accurately - if that makes any sense. FWIW - if anyone *is* contemplating buying John's machine then I'd thoroughly recommend him. Philip
Message
Re: Series IIx vs Series III
2004-04-13 by pmjtaysom
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.