Yahoo Groups archive

Fairlight-CMI

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:03 UTC

Message

Re: Series IIx vs Series III

2004-04-13 by pmjtaysom

--- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "Hermann Seib" <hermann@s...> 
> This seller is "synhouse"... and if you've ever made a trip to
> www.synhouse.com, you'll easily recognize this slightly
> over-exaggerated, marketing-oriented style :-)


Strange - I bought a fully restored Series IIx from John Hill @
Synhouse (as well as many spares and accessories) and he stikes me as
one of the very few NON 'over-exaggerated, marketing-oriented' people
I've dealt with - IMHO quite definitely one of the hardest working and
most honest people in the synth world.

The Series II was based around the Quasar microcomputer and basically
a cludge with most of the functions implemented in hardware - the
Series III is a completely different machine running a very competent
realtime operating system with much more power and flexibility.

That said, and the point I believe John Hill would have been trying to
make - the Series II is more of an esoteric, yet highly musical
machine - whereas the Series III is (still) an awesomely competent
composition tool, but perhaps slighly less 'musical' as an instrument
- because of the way it plays back so accurately - if that makes any
sense.

FWIW - if anyone *is* contemplating buying John's machine then I'd
thoroughly recommend him.

Philip

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.