Fairlight-CMI

Emu has nothing in common with Fairlight sounds, dynamic is poor.
I only use my emu when I need more polyphony.
I also noticed a big problem with emu and soft samplers: more you add
voices , less it sounds good. Thanks to the multiplexing technology;
THE big disease for sound quality.
The fairlight IIx goes down 5Hz ( infra bass ), as you say actual
standard are not the same lol
I create my sounds with many synthesizers and computers ( EMS,
oberheim, Fairlight, Emu, Silicon Graphics etc ) . My mfx2 is only 24
tracks , a little difficult to mix an entire project ( music + sound
fx ) . So my clients rent a studio to mix my projects. Protools is
everywere , especially in France :(((
Many artists still use sometimes the Fairlight to have those
particular sounds , but do you know an other system that is used
alone to produce an entire album ?
Actually, very few are still writing the gear they use on the cover.
We are not anymore in the 80' s when artist were proud to use a moog
or a synclavier.
Jarre, Peter Gabriel, Hans Zimmer are still fishing in their
Fairlight library .Duran Duran have recently bought back their
Fairlight. In fat boy slim titles, I definitly recognise some
Fairlight use on loops.

If you only use the crappy fairlight IIx factory library, I
understand you don' t like it. The best is to record your own sounds,
I simply erased 70 % of the original disks.
Or perhaps do you have a broken Fairlight, it's really strange you
need to you use a preamp guitar !!? are you sure you don' t have an
akai S1000 inside ? lol
Also , did you notice that artists were selling very few albums since
they all use protools and cheap computers/synth/samplers ?
The best selling albums had a Fairlight acting in the sessions (
excepted the Beatles ). People love tremendous sounds .

ps: you should write cmi2x ou cmi IIx , not FIIx
ps2:An other system exists to create stunning sounds, it' s called
Kyma. Lucas Film daily use it for all his movies ( Star wars, Nemo,
etc ). Aphex twin made some mixing with it ( listen to windows
licker )... but you won' t see it written on the cover lol
Secret weapons are not divulged for the public.

--- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, Laurent/LIFELIKE <lifelike@...>
wrote:
>
> Well Im speaking about guys doing real records and selling them
on
> the real market, not about guys owning the sampler for collection
or
> to show to you girlfriend that u got a very big one (big sampler
of
> course :-))))
> Im open to check the record stores if u got a band/artist name
from
> today who did his entire album on a fairlight II/III, please give
me
> the names and we will check on the cover of his record if it was
> right. It could be an interesting challenge.
> Also you say its the best sounding sampler, but if its the best
> sounding gear why dont u use it with ur client instead of
protools...
> because nobody is using it on new records ? :)))
> I also own a FIIx the sound is just a piece of crap for today
> standart, you need to plug it in a very good preamp then in a
guitar
> amp to really get THAT sound u hear on old records... and once u
want
> to play chords you need a lot of patience and ouput to have it done.
> but for sure it was a nice tools 25years ago
> Regarding the FIII, im sure it got a nice sound, but it probably
do
> well comparing to Emulator IV or III which got quite the same
sonic
> spec and to my ears Emu got the best sounding samplers, hardware
> samplers i mean.
> A matter of taste i think
> But its a nice debate anyway !
>
>
>
> Le 14 déc. 06 à 22:33, paradyse_james a écrit :
>
>; > Well, when you already own a Fairlight ( and they are hundreds to
be
> > owned :)) you don' t care about the price or the weight !
> > If It' s there , in your studio, you just need to move your hand
to
> > use
> > it.
> > How did you established that nobody use the fairlight anymore ?
> > Every week I heard about artists using Fairlight(s) in studio.
> >
> > About the sound, on a project with massive Fairlight use, the
overall
> > quality is way better than project done with protools or soft
> > samplers. But if you just use the series III marimba sample, no
doubt
> > it will change a lot of thing.
> > I noticed that the cmiII sounds were more interesting and had more
> > character in a mix. It creates really strange sounds . The cmi3
is
> > just
> > a very good sampler but less creative than his little brother.
10
> > years
> > ago I get ride of my cmi3 to buy a mfx2 , it's still the best
sounding
> > dtd .
> > I daily use protools Hd/ Apogee with my clients, the sound is just
> > missing something : presence and dynamic.
> > I own all the hardware samplers that can exist and none of them is
> > enough good to replay the Fairlight sounds. I' ve transfered all
the
> > fairlight LIbrairies in the Emu4 and Kontakt/Halion softsamplers
but
> > the original stays at an other level; this level that brings you
> > inspiration.
> >
> > --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, Laurent/LIFELIKE
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > well today nobody's doing records with a fairlight II or III;
this
> > is
> > > a heavy machine, cost a lot
> > > and the character is not what listeners are able to catch, they
> > catch
> > > nice melodies and great compositions done with a fairlight or
with a
> > > akai or on a zx spectrum, who cares
> > > is somebody here using his fairlight on NEW records ?
> > > but this library project would for sure get audience, because
the
> > > library is still interesting.
> > >
> > > Laurent
> > > --
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>