I edited the poll to go after Kevins excellent sketches so please vote again now for more clarity. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?id=11076862 ----- Original Message ----- From: "code_pig" <code_pig@yahoo.com> To: <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:28 PM Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: The definition of a new attenuator > Andreas, > > Thanks very much for the vote of confidence. I've taken what you > said and tried to incorporate it into the propossed module. You'll > find the results here: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_2.jpg > > > Regards, > Kevin > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm" > <andreas.k.lindholm@t...> wrote: > > David Salter asked for a definition of the advanced attenutator in > the > > poll. Since it is a vast majority that is pro an attenuator it is > perhaps > > time to start diskussion of the features. > > > > As I see it this sketch from Kevin is a very good suggestion that > falls > > somewhere between what I had in mind as a basic or advanced > attenutator. > > > > > > > I've put a JPG in the files section > > > > (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_1.jpg) > > > of what I'd be quite happy with. > > > > I actually find this proposed module so good that I think it should > be made > > as it is. Others have proposed ability to use it for audio purposes > and that > > wouldn't be bad. For me audiocapability is one thing that I would > definitly > > sort into the advanced version. Further more I think an advanced > version > > should have an output limit switch so you can be sure that it never > boost > > the signal about say 10 volts and risk blowing other modules with > it. > > > > I like the proposed a133 from Kevin in its setup with one in and > three out > > cause it suits me, but I can also see that other options could be > good so > > perhaps a good compromise could be to do as with the 180. The buyer > can > > choose if he wants it configured as 2-2 or 1-3 for each attenuator. > > > > Final word lets say Kevins proposal is the basic dual alternative 2. > > Everybody that want more features than is proposed please for for > > alternative 1. As for if it is possible to put in a knob in 4 or 6 > width I > > am not sure, but it seemed to fit when I glanced at the surface. > But perhaps > > the backside needs more space. Perhaps it could be a knob as the > one used > > for range selection in the vcos? > > > > Perhaps in the end we will get a whole range of attenuators. The > ideal would > > be a slim single, the proposed dual and an advanced attenuator with > voltage > > control, audio capability and max output switch? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Kevin > > > > > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, David Salter > <david.salter@r...> > > > wrote: > > > > Define advanced. > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David Salter > > > > Reuters Consulting > > > > Tel: +44 20 7542 2402 > > > > Mob: +44 7990562402 > > > > Fax: +44 20 7542 2699 > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > > > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] > > > > Sent: 25 March 2003 18:42 > > > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > > > > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the > > > > Doepfer_a100 group: > > > > > > > > Would you like Doepfer to make an > > > > attenutator module? > > > > > > > > Regarding more detailed layout we will > > > > conduct a later survey about that. > > > > > > > > o Yes, an advanced one > > > > o Yes, but only a basic dual attenuator > > > > o Yes, but only a simple single > > > > o Not sure > > > > o No > > > > > > > > > > > > To vote, please visit the following web page: > > > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys? > > > id=11076862 > > > > > > > > Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are > > > > not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! > > > > Groups > > > > web site listed above. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > > > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egroupweb/S=17 > > > 05 > > > > > > > > 032144:HM/A=1481646/R=0/*http://www.gotomypc.com/u/tr/yh/cpm/grp/300_f > > > la > > > > ke/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl> > > > > > > > > <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l? > > > M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egrou > > > > pmail/S=:HM/A=1481646/rand=219594600> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > > > > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > > > Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com > > > > > > > > Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for > > > more > > > > information and to register, visit > http://www.reuters.com/messaging > > > > > > > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the > individual > > > > sender, except where the sender specifically states them to > be > > > > the views of Reuters Ltd. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Revote
2003-03-26 by Andreas Lindholm