Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: The definition of a new attenuator

2003-03-26 by code_pig

Andreas,

Thanks very much for the vote of confidence.  I've taken what you 
said and tried to incorporate it into the propossed module.  You'll 
find the results here: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_2.jpg


Regards,
Kevin

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Lindholm" 
<andreas.k.lindholm@t...> wrote:
> David Salter asked for a definition of the advanced attenutator  in 
the
> poll. Since it is a vast majority that is pro an attenuator it is 
perhaps
> time to start diskussion of the features.
> 
> As I see it this sketch from Kevin is a very good suggestion that 
falls
> somewhere between what I had in mind as a basic or advanced 
attenutator.
> 
> 
> > I've put a JPG in the files section
> > 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/files/offset_module_1.jpg)
> >  of what I'd be quite happy with.
> 
> I actually find this proposed module so good that I think it should 
be made
> as it is. Others have proposed ability to use it for audio purposes 
and that
> wouldn't be bad. For me audiocapability is one thing that I would 
definitly
> sort into the advanced version. Further more I think an advanced 
version
> should have an output limit switch so you can be sure that it never 
boost
> the signal about say 10 volts and risk blowing other modules with 
it.
> 
> I like the proposed a133 from Kevin in its setup with one in and 
three out
> cause it suits me, but I can also see that other options could be 
good so
> perhaps a good compromise could be to do as with the 180. The buyer 
can
> choose if he wants it configured as 2-2 or 1-3 for each attenuator.
> 
> Final word lets say Kevins proposal is the basic dual alternative 2.
> Everybody that want more features than is proposed please for for
> alternative 1. As for if it is possible to put in a knob in 4 or 6 
width I
> am not sure, but it seemed to fit when I glanced at the surface. 
But perhaps
> the backside needs more space. Perhaps it could be a knob as the 
one used
> for range selection in the vcos?
> 
> Perhaps in the end we will get a whole range of attenuators. The 
ideal would
> be a slim single, the proposed dual and an advanced attenuator with 
voltage
> control, audio capability and max output switch?
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kevin
> >
> > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, David Salter 
<david.salter@r...>
> > wrote:
> > > Define advanced.
> > >
> > > regards
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > David Salter
> > > Reuters Consulting
> > > Tel: +44 20 7542 2402
> > > Mob: +44 7990562402
> > > Fax: +44 20 7542 2699
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]
> > > Sent: 25 March 2003 18:42
> > > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] New poll for Doepfer_a100
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Enter your vote today!  A new poll has been created for the
> > > Doepfer_a100 group:
> > >
> > > Would you like Doepfer to make an
> > > attenutator module?
> > >
> > > Regarding more detailed layout we will
> > > conduct a later survey about that.
> > >
> > >   o Yes, an advanced one
> > >   o Yes, but only a basic dual attenuator
> > >   o Yes, but only a simple single
> > >   o Not sure
> > >   o No
> > >
> > >
> > > To vote, please visit the following web page:
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100/surveys?
> > id=11076862
> > >
> > > Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> > > not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo!
> > > Groups
> > > web site listed above.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > >
> > 
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egroupweb/S=17
> > 05
> > >
> > 
032144:HM/A=1481646/R=0/*http://www.gotomypc.com/u/tr/yh/cpm/grp/300_f
> > la
> > > ke/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl>
> > >
> > > <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?
> > M=246920.2960106.4328965.2848452/D=egrou
> > > pmail/S=:HM/A=1481646/rand=219594600>
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
 -
> > >         Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
> > >
> > > Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for
> > more
> > > information and to register, visit 
http://www.reuters.com/messaging
> > >
> > > Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  
individual
> > > sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to 
be
> > > the views of Reuters Ltd.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.