ahhh, I always wondered why I had a rack with different style power supply than the others.....now I know. John. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@y...> wrote: > DIETER SAY: > The description of the customer tells me that the > system was > manufactured in > 1997 or earlier. Until end of 1997 we used a combined > power inlet/EMC > filter/fuse holder and a separate power switch instead > of the > combination of > power inlet/fuse holder/power switch used for all > systems manufactured > in 1998 > or later. After the EMC compatibility test in the EMC > lab to obtain the > CE sign > (EMC compatibility) it was recognized that the > expensive EMC filter is > not > necessary. So we changed to the new mains inlet > without EMC filter end > of 1997. > The two version can be distinguished very easily: If > there is a > separate power > switch (not integrated to the mains inlet) it is the > old version with > EMC filter > (manufactured until about end of 1997, maybe even > still some systems or > frames > were sold early in 1998). If the power switch is > integrated to the > mains > inlet/fuse holder it is the new version manufactured > 1998 or later. > > Obviously the EMC filter (probably the electrolyt of > one of the the > high voltage > capacitors inside the EMC filter) has become defective > and has to be > replaced. > It is available as a spare part from us or the > representative/dealer > where the > customer purchased the device. It would also be > possible to use the new > mains > inlet but in this case the complete rear panel has to > be replaced as > the holes > for the main inlets are different for both versions. > > Of course we test each power supply before we ship it > but for each > electronic > part it may happen that it becomes defective after 6 > years (or even > more) in > use. > > BTW we think about a second type of A-100 power supply > that uses > so-called > ring-core transformers. Roland Mayer has built a > prototype of this > power supply > last week and we are about to do some experiments with > the new power > supply. It > seems to be more quiet and even generates a smaller > electromagnetic > field (e.g. > important in combination with the spring reverb). > Maybe there will be > two types > of A-100 power supplies available in the future: > standard version and > "high-end" > version with ring-core transformers. But as these new > transformers are > very > expensive and have to be hard-wired and mounted by > hand to the pc board > the > price for the "high end" power supply resp. a 6HU > frame/system will > increase by > about 20~25 Euro. I will keep you informed as soon as > we decide to > offer a > second type of power supply. If we do so the "high > end" power supply > will have > the same dimensions as the old one so that each > standard power supply > could be > replaced very easily by the new one if desired. But if > the standard > power supply > works perfect for the user there is no need to change > to the "high end" > type. > The modules will not sound better :-) > > Dieter > > > > > ===== > synthfreak(parallel worlds) > athens-greece > [Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online > http://webhosting.yahoo.com
Message
Re: doepfer's info about the faulty power supply!
2003-03-14 by jmaddocks1975
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.