Doepfer

hello psm,
i agree with you 100%.
bakis.


--- "ps_minor <pscottm@hotmail.com>"
<pscottm@hotmail.com> wrote:
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "James Husted" 
> <james@e...> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I agree with this 100%. The idea of having the
> section of the 
> a155 not being
> > used is troublesome.
> 
> 
> well, i see your point but unless i'm mistaken,
> looking at my 
> a155, only 4 sockets will be disabled by connecting
> to an a154, 
> (start, stop, clock, and reset).  what's the big
> deal?   
> 
> imho, the amount of space wasted by adding a 154 to
> a 155 is 
> negligible, 2 sq inches (approx 14 sq cm) of face
> plate area.. 
> was curious so i measured.   to me, the new gains of
> adding an 
> a154 far outweigh this loss. 
> 
> i think the a100 as a whole is a marvel of
> features-per-sq-inch 
> as it is, so this loss of 4 sockets on one module
> (only when 
> combined w an expander module) is not a problem.  
> 
> however, if this issue caused loss of potential HP
> space i may 
> think differently.  
> 
> the way i see it, shortening the a155 to do away w
> the unused 
> control section will not give you any HP space.  the
> glide ouputs 
> and s&h outputs are positioned right below the
> would-be 'dead' 
> control section. 
> 
> -psm
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 


=====
synthfreak(parallel worlds)
athens-greece
[Doepfer_a100] group owner-moderator

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com