Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Random Sequence

2014-09-24 by istari

Hi

i use also a SQ10 with my euro rack. to trigger the sq10 from the 
A100 there is a spezial cable available by doepfer that changes the 
different gate phases. i also used the 0/1 conversion from the 
doepfer logic module or the trigger modifier for this ( you can also 
use a simple schmitt-trigger ). then you can use them to clock sq10 
to A100 or A100 to sq10. just something that converts a 0 volt to 5 
volt or 5 volt to 0 volt.

for the random stuff...

cheers


>  My original sequence is supplied by a Korg SQ10 - the triggers not 
>being compatible are coming from elsewhere.
>
>I want a basic shape to the sequence with a slight and varying remove from it.
>
>David 
>
><http://www.movingisliving.co.uk>www.movingisliving.co.uk
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On 23 Sep 2014, at 15:13, Nicholas Keller 
><mailto:maq163x2@gmail.com>maq163x2@gmail.com [Doepfer_a100] 
><<mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com>Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> 
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Hello David.
>>
>>You are speaking my language.
>>
>>Let's back up a bit.  You said that the S+H is being triggered in 
>>time with the original sequence.  In this case, the original 
>>sequence basically becomes unnecessary as for each step in the 
>>sequence, another voltage is added.  You are correct that the 
>>result should never repeat (at least it is highly unlikely) but it 
>>is also hardly any relation to the original random-ordered note 
>>pattern.  If you reduced the S+H clock to something more like 1 
>>bar, then you would have more of a transposing effect applied to 
>>the original random sequence, but I assume this is not the effect 
>>you were after.  What type of pattern exactly are you trying to 
>>generate?  As it is now, your mixed quantized output wouldn't be 
>>noticeably different from a more simple 118->148->156 output 
>>(unless directly comparing the two in realtime, of course).   What 
>>sequencer is creating the initial random pattern?
>>
>>Nick
>>
>>Sent from the future
>>
>>On Sep 23, 2014, at 9:05 AM, "David Kellett 
>><mailto:davidkellettwoulf@yahoo.com>davidkellettwoulf@yahoo.com 
>>[Doepfer_a100]" 
>><<mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com>Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> 
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I'm trying to create a randomised sequence. I have an analog 
>>>sequence of volta going into a quantiser via an A138 Lin. In 
>>>another channel of the 138 I have a S&H voltage. The S&H is 
>>>derived from an A148 clocked by the same trigger as the sequence 
>>>and with the sample being Random control from an A118. I expected 
>>>that the random S&H voltage would "push" the sequenced notes 
>>>slightly - so the sequence would be related to the original but 
>>>never the same. What I get is the sequence or the random - 
>>>whatever settings I use in the mixer.
>>>
>>>So what have I got wrong / not understood?
>>>
>>>David
>>>
>>><http://www.movingisliving.co.uk>www.movingisliving.co.uk
>>>
>>>Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.