Doepfer

We’ve all got our own methods of working with the equipment we use, why question the artistic choice of somebody else?

 

Sometimes working within a chosen set of constraints can take you out of your musical comfort zone and be more rewarding.  How we choose those constraints is our choice to make.

 

From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bakis Sirros
Sent: 03 May 2012 10:00
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-149-1 and A-149-2 -- digital or analog?

 

  

very nice advice Zoe, i really agree with you about this.

 
best regards,

Bakis 

________________________________
From: Zoë Blade <zoe@bytenoise.co.uk <mailto:zoe%40bytenoise.co.uk> >
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>  
Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2012 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-149-1 and A-149-2 -- digital or analog?


  
> I just find it tacky when words like 'fetishist' get thrown into the conversation.

I didn't mean for this to be an insult. I have to constantly remind myself what my main goal is (make good music), and that the sub-goals (such as make good purely electronic music) are less important and even questionable, and I need to constantly remind myself to be and remain a musician, not a collector or a fetishist (we can use the term purist if you'd prefer). At any rate, as I need to constantly remind myself of this, I thought others might benefit from a little of the same advice. If this isn't true, or it's not my place to say so, then I apologise. I didn't mean any offence and I'm sorry if I caused any.

All the best,
Zoë.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]