next time, acidaldo, if you spot a bargin like this again just wait until the subject comes up. hopefully, 3 month after spotting it, the deal will still be there, and we can all benefit. <sigh> ________________________________ From: York Luethje <ybl@yahoo.com> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012, 14:52 Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Cheep 3.5 Mono Jack Plugs DIY Yes Richard, a / signature / is / totally / the / same / as / a / link / to / some / commercial / website. / Totally/ honest / cherries / on / top. Not. Of course no subject is excluded per se. Is it relevant to the group and the discussion at hand? That is the relevant question. The initial post was out of the blue, incoherent and directing to some commercial non-Doepfer website. Thus spammer. _____ Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com] Im Auftrag von richard scott Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Februar 2012 09:20 An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Cheep 3.5 Mono Jack Plugs DIY York your posts seem quite aggressive I think. not necessary. especially when Blackberry is using them to spam us in your signature we have never /only/ debated Doepfer modules - also subjects related to eurorack, modifications, componants, DIY etc. Richard I can see you don't like it On 03/02/2012 14:27, York Brun Luethje wrote: > Richard, > > The product may be genuine. The mode of dissemination isn't. We debate Doepfer modules here. Barging in with a post saying OMG IRRELEVANTSHITISZESHIZNIT means yoy are spamming. Period. > > York > Sent via BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: richard scott<richard_scott@rwnc.co.uk <mailto:richard_scott%40rwnc.co.uk> > > Sender: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:09:31 > To:<Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > > Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Cheep 3.5 Mono Jack Plugs DIY > > in acidaldo's defence rapidonline is a legitimate company and these > /are/ bloody cheap. i don't think he was spamming > > richard > > On 03/02/2012 14:03, York Brun Luethje wrote: >> Spammer, learn2english at least. >> Sent via BlackBerry >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "acidaldo@rocketmail.com <mailto:acidaldo%40rocketmail.com> "<acidaldo@rocketmail.com <mailto:acidaldo%40rocketmail.com> > >> Sender: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> >> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:01:44 >> To:<Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> > >> Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Cheep 3.5 Mono Jack Plugs DIY >> >> Web Site Have Made A mistake On Pricing 0.044 Pence Each. Just Got 1000 For £44 Inc Del >> Go Here Before All Gone >> http://www.rapidonline.com/Cables-Connectors/3-5mm-Insulated-Mono-Jack-Plug- 20-0092 >> >> >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------ >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> > -- www.richard-scott.net http://vimeo.com/richardscot [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Cheep 3.5 Mono Jack Plugs DIY
2012-02-03 by Ian Campbell