Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Message

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Cheep 3.5 Mono Jack Plugs DIY

2012-02-03 by richard scott

Okay. Well, good luck on selling those Blackberries anyway.




On 03/02/2012 15:52, York Luethje wrote:
>
> Yes Richard,
>
> a / signature / is / totally / the / same / as / a / link / to / some /
> commercial / website. / Totally/ honest / cherries / on / top.
>
> Not.
>
> Of course no subject is excluded per se. Is it relevant to the group 
> and the
> discussion at hand?
>
> That is the relevant question. The initial post was out of the blue,
> incoherent and directing to some commercial non-Doepfer website. Thus
> spammer.
>
> _____
>
> Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> 
> [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>] Im
> Auftrag von richard scott
> Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Februar 2012 09:20
> An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Cheep 3.5 Mono Jack Plugs DIY
>
> York
>
> your posts seem quite aggressive I think. not necessary. especially when
> Blackberry is using them to spam us in your signature
>
> we have never /only/ debated Doepfer modules - also subjects related to
> eurorack, modifications, componants, DIY etc.
>
> Richard
>
> I can see you don't like it On 03/02/2012 14:27, York Brun Luethje wrote:
> > Richard,
> >
> > The product may be genuine. The mode of dissemination isn't. We debate
> Doepfer modules here. Barging in with a post saying OMG
> IRRELEVANTSHITISZESHIZNIT means yoy are spamming. Period.
> >
> > York
> > Sent via BlackBerry
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: richard scott<richard_scott@rwnc.co.uk 
> <mailto:richard_scott%40rwnc.co.uk>
> <mailto:richard_scott%40rwnc.co.uk> >
> > Sender: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:09:31
> > To:<Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> 
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> >
> > Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Cheep 3.5 Mono Jack Plugs DIY
> >
> > in acidaldo's defence rapidonline is a legitimate company and these
> > /are/ bloody cheap. i don't think he was spamming
> >
> > richard
> >
> > On 03/02/2012 14:03, York Brun Luethje wrote:
> >> Spammer, learn2english at least.
> >> Sent via BlackBerry
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: "acidaldo@rocketmail.com <mailto:acidaldo%40rocketmail.com> 
> <mailto:acidaldo%40rocketmail.com>
> "<acidaldo@rocketmail.com <mailto:acidaldo%40rocketmail.com> 
> <mailto:acidaldo%40rocketmail.com> >
> >> Sender: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:01:44
> >> To:<Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> 
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> >> Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com 
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com>
> >> Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Cheep 3.5 Mono Jack Plugs DIY
> >>
> >> Web Site Have Made A mistake On Pricing 0.044 Pence Each. Just Got 1000
> For £44 Inc Del
> >> Go Here Before All Gone
> >>
> http://www.rapidonline.com/Cables-Connectors/3-5mm-Insulated-Mono-Jack-Plug-
> 20-0092
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> -- 
> www.richard-scott.net
> http://vimeo.com/richardscot
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 


-- 
www.richard-scott.net
http://vimeo.com/richardscot



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.