Doepfer

Thanks guys,

The A-199 has won ;-)

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, achtung_999 <heinrich.himmelwasser@...> wrote:
>
> Don't know the A187-1 but I love my A199.
> Spring reverb is so much more than just reverb...
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Bakis Sirros <synth_freak_2000@...>wrote:
> 
> > **
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > IMO, no comparison at all!
> >
> > the A199 Spring Reverb has a special quality totally different than the
> > dsp reverbs. (and the A187 DSP)
> >
> > i like the A199 so much, that i have two and used them countless times in
> > the last 10 years!
> >
> > definitely go for the A199! it will give you that metallic lo-fi quality
> > of 70's reverbs, well, if you like that i mean...
> >
> > if you prefer more standard DSP effects with voltage control though, go
> > for the A187-1...
> > (i -still- haven't bought the A187-1, so i cannot comment on its quality
> > and features in the modular environment)
> >
> > Bakis Sirros
> > www. parallel - worlds - music. com
> > www. facebook. com/ pages/Parallel-Worlds/192093934136476
> > www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
> > www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
> > www. DiN. org. uk
> > www. vu-us. com
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Ton Akveld <aca@...>
> > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2012 1:02 PM
> > Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Advice wanted
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear group,
> >
> > I am in doubt. Financially I can afford myself to only buy one or two
> > modules a month, so choices have to be made ;-)
> >
> > I want to add some reverb capability to my A-100 system in progress, and I
> > have to choose between the A-187-1 VC DSP Effects module and the A-199
> > Spring Reverb.
> >
> > Both have their charms, the A-187-1 for having more possibilities, and the
> > A-199 for having those lovely springs.
> >
> > Has anybody compared the reverb quality of the two?
> >
> > Love to hear from you.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ton
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>