Doepfer

the a-111-5 was ~100 euro cheaper than the dark energy, if anyhting
module versions would be cheaper since module users normally arleady
have the case/psu/midi-cv

Paul

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:27 AM, J S <melovelove@gmail.com> wrote:
> Buying the modules seperatly wil cost much more and will also occupy much
> more space.
>
> Gr,
>
> Jean
>
> 2009/12/4 grimshaw_stuart <grimshaw@stugrimshaw.com>
>
>>
>>
>> this is indeed a strange reason not to produce modular versions. dark
>> energy is also a condensed collection of already available modules.
>>
>> i think especially Buyin thedark time would be a valuable addition to the
>> range. the a155 is too big for most first-and-foremost-a-synth racks, but
>> could be a lot handier than the a180/181/mixer/gate mixer combination that i
>> tend to prefer (tha 1555's are in a rack of their own, but don't get taken
>> to most gigs).
>>
>> as for dark matter, well the reason i decided against basing a polysnth
>> around four of the dark energy modules was the lack of a multimode filter,
>> so important for poly sounds. one of the main problems in taking a modular
>> poly on stage is the sheer number of cables, and i'm still toying with the
>> idea of four energy modules. the addition of dark matter modules would be of
>> great interest to me.
>>
>> has the dark energy module perhaps not sold as well as hoped?
>>
>> i'm sure dieter knows what he's doing, but it seems a shame :)
>>
>> stu
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>