Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-04 by normsams

Right on.  I had intended to upgrade to CS, but I'm running Windows 98SE.
When I went to upgrade to Windows 2000 so I could install CS I discovered
that much I had on my computer wasn't compatible with the Widows upgrade.
So I intend to work with Pshop 7, and do the best I can with it.

Norm
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From:  Tom Baker <tbaker1328@s...>
Date:  Fri Mar 4, 2005  9:09 am
Subject:  Re: [Digital BW] Caponigro 8-bit, 16-bit


I don't have the book in front of me at the moment, but wasn't he doing that
because most things couldn't be done in 16 bit in PS7? PS/CS (PS8) solves
most,
but not all of the issues.

Tom Baker

Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-05 by Djon

Norm, I'm still running 98 on one of my machines, but it will destroy
itself with usage...98 inherently corrupts itself. And popups vanish
with XP.  

I found it easy to switch to XP. Then the service pack 2 came
along...a big problem with already sluggish and over-complicated
Norton and McAfee but not with Computer Associates EZ Antivirus, which
updates and does its work in the background. 

When I convert my final 98 machine to XP I will first uninstall all
antivirus/popup applications because most will conflict with Service
Pack 2, which will get forced on you by the system. Norton is
especially bad. 

PS 7 is great...I don't know a justification for CS in real photography. 

Matter of fact, Elements 2 is plenty good for many purposes, though
not very intuitive for color correction if you come at this as I do
from traditional color photolab/studio photography angle.

I run Elements 2 along with 7 for its Silverfast SE. I've decided my 
Vuescan is useless because its slow, offers no particular advantage
over Silverfast, and it conflicts with my online fax/800# voicemail
system, J2.com (which I've used in for business for nine years).




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "normsams"
<normsams@w...> wrote:
> Right on.  I had intended to upgrade to CS, but I'm running Windows
98SE.
> When I went to upgrade to Windows 2000 so I could install CS I
discovered
> that much I had on my computer wasn't compatible with the Widows
upgrade.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> So I intend to work with Pshop 7, and do the best I can with it.
> 
> Norm
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-05 by guy washburn

CS justification? The ability to do everything in 16
bit and Camera Raw 2.4 (Highlight saving, browser etc)
make it a no brainer if you ask me.

Guy
--- Djon <westsidemaurice@...> wrote:

> 
> PS 7 is great...I don't know a justification for CS
> in real photography. 
> 



	
		
__________________________________ 
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-05 by Diane Fields

My feeling exactly for 16 bit adjustment layers/masking especially, altho' I do not use ACR for RAW conversion (prefer C1 with Magne Nilsen's camera profiles--ETC. and have been trying out RSE).  

Diane
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: guy washburn 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 9:35 AM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit


  CS justification? The ability to do everything in 16
  bit and Camera Raw 2.4 (Highlight saving, browser etc)
  make it a no brainer if you ask me.

  Guy
  --- Djon <westsidemaurice@...> wrote:



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-05 by Diane Fields

Dan, I think this was a typo---I believe you mean 98 to XP Pro.

Having just done this on my husband's computer, I know that XP Pro upgrade was $199 (that may be different depending upon where you buy it).  David's computer is my old computer built for me and is way more than adequate for his needs, but because we 'owned' Win 98SE and ME at the time and didn't see the need to buy XPPro for him, we had 98SE put on as OS.  It WAS adequate and 'relatively' stable for older usage, but it was driving him crazy with crashes and other problems.  We just upgraded his OS to XP Pro and what a difference.

Diane
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dan Koons 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 9:47 AM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit


  How much cost is involved to convert windows 98 to CS?  Dan
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Djon" <westsidemaurice@...>
  To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
  Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 8:26 AM
  Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit




  Norm, I'm still running 98 on one of my machines, but it will destroy
  itself with usage...98 inherently corrupts itself. And popups vanish
  with XP.

  I found it easy to switch to XP. Then the service pack 2 came
  along...a big problem with already sluggish and over-complicated
  Norton and McAfee but not with Computer Associates EZ Antivirus, which
  updates and does its work in the background.

  When I convert my final 98 machine to XP I will first uninstall all
  antivirus/popup applications because most will conflict with Service
  Pack 2, which will get forced on you by the system. Norton is
  especially bad.

  PS 7 is great...I don't know a justification for CS in real photography.

  Matter of fact, Elements 2 is plenty good for many purposes, though
  not very intuitive for color correction if you come at this as I do
  from traditional color photolab/studio photography angle.

  I run Elements 2 along with 7 for its Silverfast SE. I've decided my
  Vuescan is useless because its slow, offers no particular advantage
  over Silverfast, and it conflicts with my online fax/800# voicemail
  system, J2.com (which I've used in for business for nine years).




  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "normsams"
  <normsams@w...> wrote:
  > Right on.  I had intended to upgrade to CS, but I'm running Windows
  98SE.
  > When I went to upgrade to Windows 2000 so I could install CS I
  discovered
  > that much I had on my computer wasn't compatible with the Widows
  upgrade.
  > So I intend to work with Pshop 7, and do the best I can with it.
  >
  > Norm
  >






  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
  they are often being updated.

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
  unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
  page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
  them short.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
  Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
  membership without notice.
  - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
  printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
  the membership.
  - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
  guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
  Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

  BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
  YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
  "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
  FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
  DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
  GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND
  "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
  POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
  TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
  ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
  THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
  MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.

  Yahoo! Groups Links








  -- 
  This message has been scanned for viruses and
  dangerous content by the MailScanner at SWKO.net and is
  believed to be clean.

  -- 
  This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
  by MX3.SWKO.NET, and is believed to be clean.




  -- 
  This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content 
  by MX3.SWKO.NET, and is believed to be clean.



  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
  - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
  - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

  BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.



        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-05 by Dan Koons

How much cost is involved to convert windows 98 to CS?  Dan
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Djon" <westsidemaurice@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 8:26 AM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit




Norm, I'm still running 98 on one of my machines, but it will destroy
itself with usage...98 inherently corrupts itself. And popups vanish
with XP.

I found it easy to switch to XP. Then the service pack 2 came
along...a big problem with already sluggish and over-complicated
Norton and McAfee but not with Computer Associates EZ Antivirus, which
updates and does its work in the background.

When I convert my final 98 machine to XP I will first uninstall all
antivirus/popup applications because most will conflict with Service
Pack 2, which will get forced on you by the system. Norton is
especially bad.

PS 7 is great...I don't know a justification for CS in real photography.

Matter of fact, Elements 2 is plenty good for many purposes, though
not very intuitive for color correction if you come at this as I do
from traditional color photolab/studio photography angle.

I run Elements 2 along with 7 for its Silverfast SE. I've decided my
Vuescan is useless because its slow, offers no particular advantage
over Silverfast, and it conflicts with my online fax/800# voicemail
system, J2.com (which I've used in for business for nine years).




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "normsams"
<normsams@w...> wrote:
> Right on.  I had intended to upgrade to CS, but I'm running Windows
98SE.
> When I went to upgrade to Windows 2000 so I could install CS I
discovered
> that much I had on my computer wasn't compatible with the Widows
upgrade.
> So I intend to work with Pshop 7, and do the best I can with it.
>
> Norm
>






Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.

Yahoo! Groups Links








-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the MailScanner at SWKO.net and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
by MX3.SWKO.NET, and is believed to be clean.




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content 
by MX3.SWKO.NET, and is believed to be clean.

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-05 by Dan Koons

Diane, Thank you for correctly translating my gibberish, and thank you for
your reply. It helped. :) Dan
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Diane Fields" <picnic@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit



Dan, I think this was a typo---I believe you mean 98 to XP Pro.

Having just done this on my husband's computer, I know that XP Pro upgrade
was $199 (that may be different depending upon where you buy it).  David's
computer is my old computer built for me and is way more than adequate for
his needs, but because we 'owned' Win 98SE and ME at the time and didn't see
the need to buy XPPro for him, we had 98SE put on as OS.  It WAS adequate
and 'relatively' stable for older usage, but it was driving him crazy with
crashes and other problems.  We just upgraded his OS to XP Pro and what a
difference.

Diane
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dan Koons
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 9:47 AM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit


  How much cost is involved to convert windows 98 to CS?  Dan
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Djon" <westsidemaurice@...>
  To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
  Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 8:26 AM
  Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit




  Norm, I'm still running 98 on one of my machines, but it will destroy
  itself with usage...98 inherently corrupts itself. And popups vanish
  with XP.

  I found it easy to switch to XP. Then the service pack 2 came
  along...a big problem with already sluggish and over-complicated
  Norton and McAfee but not with Computer Associates EZ Antivirus, which
  updates and does its work in the background.

  When I convert my final 98 machine to XP I will first uninstall all
  antivirus/popup applications because most will conflict with Service
  Pack 2, which will get forced on you by the system. Norton is
  especially bad.

  PS 7 is great...I don't know a justification for CS in real photography.

  Matter of fact, Elements 2 is plenty good for many purposes, though
  not very intuitive for color correction if you come at this as I do
  from traditional color photolab/studio photography angle.

  I run Elements 2 along with 7 for its Silverfast SE. I've decided my
  Vuescan is useless because its slow, offers no particular advantage
  over Silverfast, and it conflicts with my online fax/800# voicemail
  system, J2.com (which I've used in for business for nine years).




  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "normsams"
  <normsams@w...> wrote:
  > Right on.  I had intended to upgrade to CS, but I'm running Windows
  98SE.
  > When I went to upgrade to Windows 2000 so I could install CS I
  discovered
  > that much I had on my computer wasn't compatible with the Widows
  upgrade.
  > So I intend to work with Pshop 7, and do the best I can with it.
  >
  > Norm
  >






  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
  they are often being updated.

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
  unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
  page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
  them short.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
  Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
  membership without notice.
  - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
  printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
  the membership.
  - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
  guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner
and
  Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

  BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
  YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
  "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO
YOU
  FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
  DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
  GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND
  "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
  POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
  TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO
OR
  ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF
ANY
  THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
  MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.

  Yahoo! Groups Links








  -- 
  This message has been scanned for viruses and
  dangerous content by the MailScanner at SWKO.net and is
  believed to be clean.

  -- 
  This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
  by MX3.SWKO.NET, and is believed to be clean.




  -- 
  This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
  by MX3.SWKO.NET, and is believed to be clean.



  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
they are often being updated.

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership without notice.
  - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
the membership.
  - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

  BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.



        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
              ADVERTISEMENT





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/

    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.

Yahoo! Groups Links








-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the MailScanner at SWKO.net and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
by MX3.SWKO.NET, and is believed to be clean.




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content 
by MX3.SWKO.NET, and is believed to be clean.

[Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-05 by Djon

I don't work a lot with my digital camera...presumably RAW will
eventually become important for me. I do know from experience that 16
bit has tone/color advantages over 8, just like fine grain film has
some advantages over grainy (and some disadvantages). 

From a purely utility point of view Silverfast SE, at 8 bit, is
superior to Vuescan, less buggy (Vuescan conflicts with other apps),
faster. The speed issue is brought up regularly.

If you prioritize technical "quality" over compromise you'll work in
large format or medium format,  scan, thereby immediately beating any
digital original (that'll change with Mamiya's 22MP). RAW is
irrelevant to scans.

 John P C illustrates part of my point...his technical ideas are
evidently useful, but I doubt many think he's doing photography at a
level that would have been noticed pre-digital without that name.
Weston, by contrast, had two kids who were masters.

8 Vs 16 bit is not necessarily important. Plenty of great work has
been done with the simplest technology, pursuit of maximum resolution
or maximum tonal scale subtlety doesn't necessarily relate to the
merits of a photographic image...though it's good for pushing sales
and consumer obsession.

The perils of consumerism: Take for example the Canon 20D or the Nikon
D90. We know they're goners by this Summer, when the 30D and D80 that
already do exist are announced. Then the latest buyers will gloat, the
20D/D70 shooters will feel bad, and Nikon/Canon will chuckle all the
way to the bank because they have 12MP prosumer cameras in the works
for 2007.   


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, guy washburn
<guido02474@y...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> CS justification? The ability to do everything in 16
> bit and Camera Raw 2.4 (Highlight saving, browser etc)
> make it a no brainer if you ask me.
> 
> Guy
> --- Djon <westsidemaurice@y...> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > PS 7 is great...I don't know a justification for CS
> > in real photography. 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
> Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 
> http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/

[Digital BW] Re: Caponigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-05 by Tom Andrews

Hi,

In my own experience I have yet to find any use for 16-bit files, which agrees 
with Dan Margulis' ideas (check out long discussions on Colortheory list).  I 
scan MF film on a Nikon8000 and make prints to 32x40 with an Epson 10K 
and find 8-bit files just as good as 16-bit files for correcting in PS.  I have 
tested this with a number of files.  However, I almost never make really large 
changes in my files.  Recently I have taken to doing my scans in 8-bit, which 
gives me a 250Mb rather than a 500Mb file.  So I get twice the storage 
capacity of my hard drives.  I am always ready to be proven wrong, however.  
Cheers,

Tom Andrews
http://www.wildlandart.com

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caponigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-05 by Peter Gorwin

Hello Tom:

The number of shades of gray in 8-bit is 2 to the 8th power (hence  the 
256 shades of gray.)
Multiply that binary to the 16th power and see how many more shades of 
gray that you end up with.  It's thousands.
Would you rather have thousands of shades of gray or 256 shades to work 
with in your b&w prints?
If you do really make big changes to your files, and you squeeze CS for 
all that it's worth (something that I'm still
certainly trying to figure out how to do), you'll find that you have 
lots more latitude in your shadow detail than you could
ever possibly hope to achieve in 8 bit.

Peter Gorwin
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Mar 5, 2005, at 1:53 PM, Tom Andrews wrote:

>
>
> Hi,
>
> In my own experience I have yet to find any use for 16-bit files, 
> which agrees
> with Dan Margulis' ideas (check out long discussions on Colortheory 
> list).  I
> scan MF film on a Nikon8000 and make prints to 32x40 with an Epson 10K
> and find 8-bit files just as good as 16-bit files for correcting in 
> PS.  I have
> tested this with a number of files.  However, I almost never make 
> really large
> changes in my files.  Recently I have taken to doing my scans in 
> 8-bit, which
> gives me a 250Mb rather than a 500Mb file.  So I get twice the storage
> capacity of my hard drives.  I am always ready to be proven wrong, 
> however.
> Cheers,
>
> Tom Andrews
> http://www.wildlandart.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
> resources as they are often being updated.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
> keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from 
> the membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital 
> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
> removed from the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and 
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group 
> Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the 
> Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
>
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” 
> AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE 
> LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, 
> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 
> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE 
> LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
> YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), 
> RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, 
> THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF 
> YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD 
> PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER 
> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-05 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Djon"
<westsidemaurice@y...> wrote:
snip...
> 8 Vs 16 bit is not necessarily important.
snip...

and

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Andrews"
<tandrews@b...> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In my own experience I have yet to find any use for 16-bit files,
which agrees 
> with Dan Margulis' ideas (check out long discussions on Colortheory
list).
snip...

As someone who works on other people's files on a regular basis I can
vouch for the unquestioned advantage of hi bit for B&W.
Currently I'm struggling with banding in gradated skies that have come
in from someone who knows what they are doing, made otherwise good
scans, but with an old Imacon that would not yeild 16 bit (could have
been old software).
I've seen it time and time again.
I regularly rescan for people because of this, many pro scanning
services will not offer 16 bit, nor understand why you want it.
We're in a niche here.
If you are fine with 8 bit files, keep working and be grateful. But if
you keep going with this stuff over the years, particularly single
channel B&W gray files with extremely accurate output systems, you
will find the need to go to 16 bit.
Who has time to argue with Margulis, he doesn't do what we do, and
most of us who work with this stuff every day know he's wrong for our
application of the technology.
If you are interested in someone who knows what they are talking about
and can counter him, go to Bruce Lindbloom's site.
Tyler

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caponigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-05 by Carolyn Frayn

On 3/5/05 2:53 PM, "Tom Andrews" sent the following verbage:

> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In my own experience I have yet to find any use for 16-bit files, which agrees
> with Dan Margulis' ideas (check out long discussions on Colortheory list).

Usually the argument is whether or not you see that difference in the final
print vs the monitor. Years back I think I was sitting on the fence about
whether the work I was doing transferring masks and adjustments from 8 bit
to 16 bit was worth the time on some images. (a workflow I did *not* learn
from Caponigro and it's been around a long time). I certainly see the
difference now, with the better drivers and better workflows... In my
opinion there was never an argument over the degradation the image goes thru
when doing manipulations in 8 bit vs 16 bit. It's totally evident.

Mr. Margulis doesn't do this stuff, he's a prepress and color guy, different
ballpark altogether and in my opinion the argument here is irrelevant. Apart
from that, I don't agree with him about color image files either. The proof
for me is the same as you, I *see* the difference.

PS CS is a boon to what I do, both BW and color, fine art, client output,
and prepress etc... Regarding PS5.5... Prior to PS6, color management was
horrendous, control was never standard, closed loop systems ruled the roost.
That changed with 6, and then we all waited impatiently for 16bit control
throughout... With 16 bit support, using 16bit RAW image scans (I use SF6
RAW, then process thru HDR for a lot of control), then the adjustment layer
and masking capabilities available in PSCS (gone the days of alpha channels
on a continual basis), to me it only makes sense to upgrade and use these
current tools.


I 
> scan MF film on a Nikon8000 and make prints to 32x40 with an Epson 10K
> and find 8-bit files just as good as 16-bit files for correcting in PS.  I
> have 
> tested this with a number of files.

If it works for you, then that's great. I have to do some heavy work at
times on clients scans, and sometimes my own when I'm working a montage.. My
own art etc, where I choose to mess the crap out of my work, I appreciate
all the bits I can get.

>  However, I almost never make really large
> changes in my files.  Recently I have taken to doing my scans in 8-bit, which
> gives me a 250Mb rather than a 500Mb file.  So I get twice the storage
> capacity of my hard drives.

Storage space is not expensive anymore... I archive all files in 16bit RAW,
and then in adjusted files. You never know.

Whatever works. :)

Carolyn

--
http://www.carolynfrayn.com

[Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-06 by Tom Andrews

Hi Tyler,

No I don't want to reargue the Margulis-Lindbloom argument.  What was 
important to me was simply that Margulis questioned the received wisdom 
that 16bit provided a descernible advantage to 8bit files.  His questioning 
provoked me to do some testing on my own images.  So I took a number of 
medium format film images that I knew would need some correction and 
scanned them at both 8bit and 16bit, did my corrections, cropped out smaller 
portions from files expanded to produce 32x40 prints and compared the 
prints.  I couldn't see any differences.  That coupled with the fact that the 
correcting I generally do is usually quite subtle and not particularly histogram 
busting, led me to think that scanning in 16bit was a waste of time and 
space.  However, I can certainly appreciate that other photographers might 
find real advantages to a 16bit work flow for their work.  Cheers,

Tom Andrews
http://www.wildlandart.com 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> As someone who works on other people's files on a regular basis I can
> vouch for the unquestioned advantage of hi bit for B&W.
> Currently I'm struggling with banding in gradated skies that have come
> in from someone who knows what they are doing, made otherwise good
> scans, but with an old Imacon that would not yeild 16 bit (could have
> been old software).
> I've seen it time and time again.
> I regularly rescan for people because of this, many pro scanning
> services will not offer 16 bit, nor understand why you want it.
> We're in a niche here.
> If you are fine with 8 bit files, keep working and be grateful. But if
> you keep going with this stuff over the years, particularly single
> channel B&W gray files with extremely accurate output systems, you
> will find the need to go to 16 bit.
> Who has time to argue with Margulis, he doesn't do what we do, and
> most of us who work with this stuff every day know he's wrong for our
> application of the technology.
> If you are interested in someone who knows what they are talking about
> and can counter him, go to Bruce Lindbloom's site.
> Tyler

[Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-06 by john dean

I have seen the difference when smooth tonal gradations are present, such as in a sky area 
or seamless backdrop gradation or a delicate portrait value transition. In things such as 
landscapes or textured subjects you probably wouldn't have noticed a difference. I 
certainly have noticed less banding from digital camera portraits when captured and 
worked on in 16 bit, but I've only seen this with color, and yea the more you twist the 
limits of the data with curves and color adjustments the more data you need up front.

John


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Andrews" <tandrews@b...> 
wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> Hi Tyler,
> 
> No I don't want to reargue the Margulis-Lindbloom argument.  What was 
> important to me was simply that Margulis questioned the received wisdom 
> that 16bit provided a descernible advantage to 8bit files.  His questioning 
> provoked me to do some testing on my own images.  So I took a number of 
> medium format film images that I knew would need some correction and 
> scanned them at both 8bit and 16bit, did my corrections, cropped out smaller 
> portions from files expanded to produce 32x40 prints and compared the 
> prints.  I couldn't see any differences.  That coupled with the fact that the 
> correcting I generally do is usually quite subtle and not particularly histogram 
> busting, led me to think that scanning in 16bit was a waste of time and 
> space.  However, I can certainly appreciate that other photographers might 
> find real advantages to a 16bit work flow for their work.  Cheers,
> 
> Tom Andrews
> http://www.wildlandart.com 
> 
>  
> > As someone who works on other people's files on a regular basis I can
> > vouch for the unquestioned advantage of hi bit for B&W.
> > Currently I'm struggling with banding in gradated skies that have come
> > in from someone who knows what they are doing, made otherwise good
> > scans, but with an old Imacon that would not yeild 16 bit (could have
> > been old software).
> > I've seen it time and time again.
> > I regularly rescan for people because of this, many pro scanning
> > services will not offer 16 bit, nor understand why you want it.
> > We're in a niche here.
> > If you are fine with 8 bit files, keep working and be grateful. But if
> > you keep going with this stuff over the years, particularly single
> > channel B&W gray files with extremely accurate output systems, you
> > will find the need to go to 16 bit.
> > Who has time to argue with Margulis, he doesn't do what we do, and
> > most of us who work with this stuff every day know he's wrong for our
> > application of the technology.
> > If you are interested in someone who knows what they are talking about
> > and can counter him, go to Bruce Lindbloom's site.
> > Tyler

Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-06 by mojojones2001

I find the difference in working in 16 bit significant when doing
initial tonal corrections.  The extra data allows you to make much
more tonal shifts without producing gaps.  Once I've done that I go to
8 bit for all other edits.  Now whether or not your capture or output
device and differentiate that many levels is another story.

John

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-06 by Paul D. DeRocco

> From: mojojones2001 [mailto:mojojones@...]
>
> I find the difference in working in 16 bit significant when doing
> initial tonal corrections.  The extra data allows you to make much
> more tonal shifts without producing gaps.  Once I've done that I go to
> 8 bit for all other edits.  Now whether or not your capture or output
> device and differentiate that many levels is another story.

Are you talking about gaps in the histogram? Those don't necessarily
translate into anything visible in the image. If there's enough noise or
texture in the image, it will dither across the gap, effectively filling it
in, as far as the eye is concerned.

I've only seen slight degradation due to 8-bit resolution in blue sky from a
very quiet low ISO digicam image.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@...

Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-06 by mojojones2001

Yes, I am talking about gaps in the histogram which while it may not
always translate into obvious visual degradation, it does represent
degradation.  I've always worked from the premise of "do the least
harm" when doing photography whether optical or digital.  Working in
16 bit gives you the most benefit when dealing with images that have a
compressed dynamic range, like for example an overexposed negative.
Suppose the dynamic range cover only 1/4 of the histogram and we want
to expand it out to a full range image.  Working in 16 bit, we would
have 16384 tonal values to spread out over the resulting 256 tones.
That will give you an incredibly smooth range when resolved down. In
contrast, if you were starting in 8 bit, we'd only have 64 levels to
work with and the result of stretching it out would be a three missing
or interpolated values for every one.

John

> From: mojojones2001 [mailto:mojojones@c...]
>
> I find the difference in working in 16 bit significant when doing
> initial tonal corrections. The extra data allows you to make much
> more tonal shifts without producing gaps. Once I've done that I go to
> 8 bit for all other edits. Now whether or not your capture or output
> device and differentiate that many levels is another story.

Are you talking about gaps in the histogram? Those don't necessarily
translate into anything visible in the image. If there's enough noise or
texture in the image, it will dither across the gap, effectively
filling it
in, as far as the eye is concerned.

I've only seen slight degradation due to 8-bit resolution in blue sky
from a
very quiet low ISO digicam image.

--

Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
Paul mailto:pderocco@i...

[Digital BW] Re: Caonigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-07 by Tyler Boley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Andrews"
<tandrews@b...> wrote:
> 
>... the fact that the 
> correcting I generally do is usually quite subtle and not
particularly histogram 
> busting, led me to think that scanning in 16bit was a waste of time and 
> space...

given the amount of things we deal with that are problematic, my
attitude these days is if it works, don't mess with it!
Tyler

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Caponigro 8-bit, 16-bit

2005-03-07 by Seth

You are absolutely correct.  However, once you exceed the ability of the
printer and inks to reproduce those, they must compress when you print.

Just as the Zone System sought to bring exposure/film/development into the
gamut that B&W paper could reproduce with its 128 shades of gray plus black
and white.

Seth 

==-----Original Message-----
==From: Peter Gorwin [mailto:pshelleyg@...] 
==Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 6:00 PM
==To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
==Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Caponigro 8-bit, 16-bit
==
==
==Hello Tom:
==
==The number of shades of gray in 8-bit is 2 to the 8th power 
==(hence  the
==256 shades of gray.)
==Multiply that binary to the 16th power and see how many more 
==shades of gray that you end up with.  It's thousands.
==Would you rather have thousands of shades of gray or 256 
==shades to work with in your b&w prints?
==If you do really make big changes to your files, and you 
==squeeze CS for all that it's worth (something that I'm still 
==certainly trying to figure out how to do), you'll find that 
==you have lots more latitude in your shadow detail than you 
==could ever possibly hope to achieve in 8 bit.
==
==Peter Gorwin
==
==On Mar 5, 2005, at 1:53 PM, Tom Andrews wrote:
==
==>
==>
==> Hi,
==>
==> In my own experience I have yet to find any use for 16-bit files, 
==> which agrees with Dan Margulis' ideas (check out long 
==discussions on 
==> Colortheory list).  I scan MF film on a Nikon8000 and make 
==prints to 
==> 32x40 with an Epson 10K and find 8-bit files just as good as 16-bit 
==> files for correcting in PS.  I have tested this with a number of 
==> files.  However, I almost never make really large changes 
==in my files.  
==> Recently I have taken to doing my scans in 8-bit, which gives me a 
==> 250Mb rather than a 500Mb file.  So I get twice the storage 
==capacity 
==> of my hard drives.  I am always ready to be proven wrong, however.
==> Cheers,
==>
==> Tom Andrews
==> http://www.wildlandart.com
==>
==>
==>
==>
==>
==>
==> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
==> resources as they are often being updated.
==>
==> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
==>
==> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or 
==you wish 
==> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
==> this same page.
==>
==> Please follow these basic guidelines:
==> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
==messages to 
==> keep them short.
==> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
==> flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be 
==removed from 
==> the membership without notice.
==> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital 
==> B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
==> removed from the membership.
==> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group 
==rules and 
==> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group 
==> Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and 
==Guidelines" in the 
==> Files section:
==> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
==>
==> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
==> PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT 
==THE "OWNER"
==> AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE 
==> LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, 
==> CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 
==> DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER 
==INTANGIBLE 
==> LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL 
==BW, THE PRINT 
==> YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), 
==> RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, 
==> THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF 
==> YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF 
==ANY THIRD 
==> PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER 
==> MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
==>
==> Yahoo! Groups Links
==>
==>
==>
==>
==>
==>
==>
==
==
==
==------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
==--------------------~--> Has someone you know been affected 
==by illness or disease?
==Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
==http://us.click.yahoo.com/rkgkPB/UOnJAA/Zx0JAA/ucIolB/TM
==--------------------------------------------------------------
==------~-> 
==
==Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
==resources as they are often being updated.
==
==http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
==
==If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or 
==you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership 
==preferences by visiting this same page.
==
==Please follow these basic guidelines:
==- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
==messages to keep them short.
==- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks 
==or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be 
==removed from the membership without notice.
==- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of 
==digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic 
==posts may be removed from the membership.
==- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group 
==rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and 
==decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group 
==Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
==http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
==
==BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL 
==BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE 
==THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
==YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, 
==INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY 
==DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF 
==PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN 
==IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT 
==YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH 
==DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE 
==THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED 
==ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) 
==STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, 
==THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO 
==THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
== 
==Yahoo! Groups Links
==
==
==
== 
==
==
==
==
==

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.