Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Printing on transluscent vellum

Printing on transluscent vellum

2005-01-14 by elitephotolv

I have been trying, unsucessfully so far, to print on a transluscent 
vellum with my 2200.  So far, I have only tried a box of paper I 
picked up at Office Depot.

It said inkjet vellum but the ink does not dry fast enough to avoid 
smearing inside the printer.

Has anyone had any success doing this?  If so, what paper were you 
using?  I am interested in the standard cut sheet sizes, not roll 
paper.

Thanks for your help,
Randy Becker

Re: Printing on transluscent vellum

2005-01-14 by Steven Karafyllakis

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "elitephotolv" 
<elitephotolv@e...> wrote:
> 
> I have been trying, unsucessfully so far, to print on a 
transluscent 
> vellum with my 2200.  So far, I have only tried a box of paper I 
> picked up at Office Depot.
> 
> It said inkjet vellum but the ink does not dry fast enough to 
avoid 
> smearing inside the printer.
> 
> Has anyone had any success doing this?  If so, what paper were you 
> using?  I am interested in the standard cut sheet sizes, not roll 
> paper.
> 
> Thanks for your help,
> Randy Becker

Sorry, I don't understand: what exactly are you trying to accomplish 
by printing on vellum? Which BTW is almost certainly intended as a 
text not photo medium.

Steve Karafyllakis

Re: [Digital BW] Printing on transluscent vellum

2005-01-14 by James Irelan

On Jan 13, 2005, at 10:50 PM, elitephotolv wrote:

>
>  I have been trying, unsucessfully so far, to print on a transluscent
>  vellum with my 2200. 
>
>  It said inkjet vellum but the ink does not dry fast enough to avoid
>  smearing inside the printer.
>
>  Has anyone had any success doing this?  If so, what paper were you
>  using?  I am interested in the standard cut sheet sizes, not roll
>  paper.
>
>

I tried this once years ago- can't remember why- don't remember the ink 
smearing, but do remember the print quality looking like crap.

James

RE: [Digital BW] Printing on transluscent vellum

2005-01-14 by Andy Biggs

Randy-
 
I would think that you need to be using a RIP whereby you can limit your ink
that is put out of the nozzles...

   _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: elitephotolv [mailto:elitephotolv@...] 
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 5:51 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Printing on transluscent vellum



I have been trying, unsucessfully so far, to print on a transluscent 
vellum with my 2200.  So far, I have only tried a box of paper I 
picked up at Office Depot.

It said inkjet vellum but the ink does not dry fast enough to avoid 
smearing inside the printer.

Has anyone had any success doing this?  If so, what paper were you 
using?  I am interested in the standard cut sheet sizes, not roll 
paper.

Thanks for your help,
Randy Becker





Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
they are often being updated.

HYPERLINK
"http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint"http://groups.ya
hoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from
the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files section:
HYPERLINK
"http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/"http://gr
oups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND
�MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS,
GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  �OWNER� AND
�MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY
TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR
ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY
THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER
MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.




   _____  

Yahoo! Groups Links


*	To visit your group on the web, go to:
HYPERLINK
"http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/"http://groups.y
ahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
  

*	To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
HYPERLINK
"mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Uns
ubscribe"DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
  

*	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the HYPERLINK
"http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/"Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.11 - Release Date: 1/12/2005



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.11 - Release Date: 1/12/2005
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Printing on transluscent vellum

2005-01-14 by DigitalLipothymy@aol.com

In a message dated 1/14/2005 12:52:52 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
elitephotolv@... writes:

I have  been trying, unsucessfully so far, to print on a transluscent 
vellum with  my 2200.  So far, I have only tried a box of paper I 
picked up at  Office Depot.

It said inkjet vellum but the ink does not dry fast  enough to avoid 
smearing inside the printer.




you probably need to use something like inkAID as a precoat before running  
the sheet through your printer.
 
_www.inkAID.com_ (http://www.inkAID.com) 
 
karina


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Printing on transluscent vellum

2005-01-14 by Djon

I wanted to print on the various beautiful translucent vellums sold by
a local fine paper shop...but they advised me that since it's a
plastic base it tends not to hold the pigment.

I think it'd be interesting to print one pass on vellum and another,
possibly in color, on a very bright white such as Enhanced Matte. The
2200 does an incredibly good job of registration, so that's not an issue.

The 2200 can print on just about any paper, so I'm sure the fine true
paper vellums (like those used to cover plates in ancient books, and
that are obviously archival fwiw) will work well, but I've not found
any locally.

Wouldn't it be boring if we could only print on stuff like OEM? Major
Epson advantage. 

 










--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com,
DigitalLipothymy@a... wrote:
>  
> In a message dated 1/14/2005 12:52:52 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
> elitephotolv@e... writes:
> 
> I have  been trying, unsucessfully so far, to print on a transluscent 
> vellum with  my 2200.  So far, I have only tried a box of paper I 
> picked up at  Office Depot.
> 
> It said inkjet vellum but the ink does not dry fast  enough to avoid 
> smearing inside the printer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> you probably need to use something like inkAID as a precoat before
running  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> the sheet through your printer.
>  
> _www.inkAID.com_ (http://www.inkAID.com) 
>  
> karina
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.