Re: [Digital BW] Take this Test for Fun: Is it Fine Art or is itSpam?
2001-10-19 by Steadman Uhlich
Thanks trish, that was very nice. Have to keep that handy. Get some Sleep out there in the West. Steadman
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: ternahan
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Take this Test for Fun: Is it Fine Art or is itSpam?
A portrait's art holds
silence between heartbeats it's
time held up to see.
The camera keeps
silence shadows secrets dreams
fleeting memories.
t
> From: "Steadman Uhlich" <steadmanuhlich@...>
> Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:53:49 -0500
> To: <piezography3000@yahoogroups.com>,
> <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Digital BW] Take this Test for Fun: Is it Fine Art or is it Spam?
>
> Greetings Fellow Digital PrintMakers (and PiezoHeads)! (This is
> cross-pollinated on two lists)
>
> After so much discussion of the finer points of dust, clogs, ink, scanning
> software and other mundane technical stuff, I think it is time we shift gears
> into the upper atmosphere where the discussion of "high art" takes place.
> Recently there has been fascinating discussion of Gallery Demands, Portfolios
> and Exhibitions.
>
> Not everyone on these lists is a "fine art photographer" obviously as some
> people buy into the whole digital printing world to just print some snaps of
> the grandkids...and there is nothing wrong with that.
>
> But as so many of us aspire to raise our images to the highest quality level
> we can...and perhaps selling price too....we might all be lumped together as
> "fine art digital printmakers."
>
> Now enough of the soft and easy get you in the mood wordy stuff...
>
> Here is the real question: What makes a "Fine Art Portrait"....ahem...."fine
> art?"
>
> What? Don't you know?
>
> Seriously, I was looking over some commercial photography today and saw many
> other "portraits" of all types (in Vanity Fair for instance) and even in the
> newspaper.
>
> What I would like to throw out to the list(s) is an opportunity to spout off
> on the merits of a "fine art" portrait versus your plain old everyday run of
> the mill portrait...you know the kind...the ones that fill our own photo
> albums and chronicle our own childhoods and those of our children and possibly
> grandchildren.
>
> I am curious what you all think about this. I ask this because I see such a
> wide range of "portraits" and sometimes there are a few that really stick out
> and grab me. Perhaps that is what makes me think "fine art." Something
> "sticky" about the shot.
>
> Just to get you guys and gals started, I will throw in a few dastardly
> opinions...sort of a straw man that you can take apart...or use as a launching
> pad for your own questionable opinions. : So here is your chance to wax
> poetic (loved those haikus), hyper-critical, knowitall, or simply amused (hope
> someone out there smiles)...or simply spout off the stuff you learned in
> art/photography school or by reading a book by Ansel or some other more
> obscure wag. Whatever your personal spin, see if you can agree or disagree
> with the following Straw Man (not burning man) and perhaps even add a few
> points of your own. I hope you enjoy the "test."
>
> THE STRAW MAN
>
> 1. A Fine Art Portrait must use the finest materials?
>
> 2. A Fine Art Portrait looks like it took more than 5 minutes to make...
>
> 3. A Fine Art Portrait looks like the studio doesn't have cute props or
> feathered angel wings...
>
> 4. A Fine Art Portrait looks like the subject has had a bad day (scowling at
> the camera)...
>
> 5. A Fine Art Portrait looks like the subject is bored (no smiles here Mr.
> Photographer)...
>
> 6. A Fine Art Portrait looks like it is "expensive"....
>
> 7. A Fine Art Portrait is definitely/always/must be in glorious Black &
> White....
>
> 8. A Fine Art Portrait is always of someone...else.
>
> Anyway, that should get you started...
>
> Steadman (elipsis man)
>
> Tune in tomorrow for the Flip Side..."What About Low Art Portraits"...is it
> art or spam? (wink)
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
> resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]