On Apr 8, 2010, at 10:09 PM, Mark wrote: > 18.5 Wilhelm years Lots of very informative answers that I do appreciate, but I still don't have an answer to the basic question (I think I have also inadvertently demonstrated that Warhol was right and I am getting Intro 101 answers about longevity because my 15 minutes were more than a decade ago): What does 18.5 Wilhelm years MEAN? Is it like dog years (tongue firmly in cheek)? Who came up with "Wilhelm years" and how do those numbers relate to the published Wilhelm numbers? I see 18.5 years and I am entirely unimpressed, so I must assume some other meaning is involved. David Kachel [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: New Aardenburg Imaging fade tests posted
2010-04-09 by David Kachel