Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: New Aardenburg Imaging fade tests posted

2010-04-09 by David Kachel

On Apr 8, 2010, at 10:09 PM, Mark wrote:

> 18.5 Wilhelm years

Lots of very informative answers that I do appreciate, but I still don't have an answer to the basic question (I think I have also inadvertently demonstrated that Warhol was right and I am getting Intro 101 answers about longevity because my 15 minutes were more than a decade ago): 

What does 18.5 Wilhelm years MEAN? Is it like dog years (tongue firmly in cheek)? Who came up with "Wilhelm years" and how do those numbers relate to the published Wilhelm numbers?

I see 18.5 years and I am entirely unimpressed, so I must assume some other meaning is involved.

David Kachel



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.