Thanks, Paul I have those documents. I think I will stay safe and get the Kodak Photo Flo. I can't get Tergitol in the UK, much as I'd like to try it with Arches. I'm using a 2200 so I will stick with your first formulation (C6a). Best, Mark pr_roark wrote: > > > "m_r_tomlinson" <lithprinter@...> wrote: > > > I am about to mix a carbon-6 inkset by diluting eboni, > > with water, glycerol and a surfactant. > > > The recommended surfactant is Kodak Photo Flo. > > There are now 3 distinct types or categories of the original C6 base. > See http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Ink-Mixing.pdf. > <http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Ink-Mixing.pdf.> With each > iteration, a new surfactant has been added. > > Photo Flo has some glycol in it as well as the active surfactant. This > glycol component may be an important co-solvent in the mix. My C6c mix > clouds without the Photo Flo. > > > I am in the UK and it is much easier and cheaper > > for me to get Ilford Ilfotec. > > I don't know the ingredients of that mix. Try to find their Material > Safety Data Sheet or other source of what is in the Ilford mix. > > > Does it matter which wetting agent is used? > > Yes, the surfactant mix is a big part of the game. > > > With regard to glycerol ... > > I think of it as a commodity. I'm using a 99.7% pure version. > > I don't know if there are differences among glycerols (aka glycerin > and glycerine). > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Alternatives to Photoflo in Carbon-6 inkset? What type of Glycerol?
2009-10-13 by Mark Tomlinson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.