>Hello all, > >I just stumbled across the details for a Milton Greene exhibit in the UK. >Apparently these are bw ( and color ) prints that were printed on Hahnemuhle >papers (on whose site I read this). But the surprise is that they were done on >an HP printer. > >Are we too entrenched in the Epson camp to notice other printers? Does >anyone have pluses and minuses for HPs and other alternatives? > >Here is an excerpt: >>>>Having taken hours of digital retouching in some cases, Joshua Greene >has found a solution for outputting these prints onto Hahnemuhle Digital Fine >Art papers using the Hewlett Packard Designjet 5000PS printer, which with its >UV inks combined with the Hahnemuhle media will last up to 200 years, much >longer than a traditional photograph. ><<< > >more at: >http://www.hahnemuhle.com/ >under "news". > >Any thoughts? Nij?... > >Antonis Two week ago I was two days in Epson DE. Main interest of lessons was technical parameters, setup and care of Pro printers - 5000-10000. I may say, that difference between Epson Stylus Pro 10000 and HP 5000 is only 3 m of paper - the test which shows all parameters which MUST be set up to print in 100 % quality on Epson SP 10000. It is realy simple. Martin Sluka --
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson vs HP for fine art bw???
2002-02-15 by Martin Sluka
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.