> I have not had a chance to look at all of these, but I did quickly > compare pages 4 of the tests Epson ink v. MIS ink on Red River Pro > Gloss paper. > > Epson OEM ink test restults are at: > > http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/pdfs/AaI_20071008_SN002(Lf).pdf > > > MIS R800 ink test is at: > > http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/pdfs/AaI_20071008_SN002(Lf).pdf > Look at pages "4(5 of 9)". I suggest looking at p. 6 (7 of 9) as it is the 20 year test equivalent and shows you how the fading trend plays out. > Compare the Epson and MIS Black (F4) and Max Black (F5) in the charts. > Both Epson and MIS PK have an excellent I* of 100.0 (the best rating). Yes, PK looks quite stable. Too bad there's no MK test but I'd guess it would be at least as good. I am strongly considering switching my yellow ink based on this test for color work- noticable tone shifts after 10 years aren't too appealing. Does anyone know if the MIS R1800 yellow and R2400 yellow are the same, and thus would an Epson OEM ultrachrome yellow sucked out of a cart like for the 3800 work? Would the new MIS refill kit be able to extract this ink or would you have to drill a hole in the cartridge or is it impossible? In the meantime I will probably reload my Epson OEM Yellow (I'm already using the Epson PK as it gets a better Dmax with the driver).
Message
Re: Aardenburg lightfastness tests
2008-05-01 by Roger
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.