Steve- Thanks, I did see the new size which makes a difference to me because a larger image will fit on the sheet. I print frames that are 3:2. i.e. full frame 35mm. I have profiles for the Harman at both 1440 and 2880 and compared two prints of the same image. Yes, the ink looks as good at 2880, very integrated. I do also fine a subtle bit of refinement in the image at 2880, and it is probably worth using. I don't know what Harman's recommendations are based on. They also sugggest a paper selection of Watercolor (matte) for the 4800, 7800 and 9800 as compared to Premium Semigloss for most other printers. I used Premium Glossy 250 and that seems to work fine. On the Ilford Silk, I ordered a second box from a different supplier to see if the sheets would be cleaner, but they're not--longitudinal abrasions and "pox" marks on the surface. I've actually printed two profiling targets on different sheets and both have been unusable because of defects in the paper. I think this is out for me. I'm very impressed with the Harman paper and, to a slightly lesser extent the Epson. I have heard that the Epson is the Innova paper, but I have had terrible quality issues with Innova papers and would personally try not to use them. The Epson Fiber I've used so far has been perfect. Good wishes, Walt
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Another take on the "fiber/baryta" papers . . .
2008-01-30 by wwodets
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.