--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "jskimjskimjskim" <jskimjskimjskim@...> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I am a newbie and want to know if it is better to get a rip program > and new inks or get the 3800? > > People seem to say that the 2400 was much better than the 2200, so I > figure the 3800 would even be better. > > I noticed the Quad and IJC? was mentioned for programs. > > Also, can I get cartridges like the OEM, since I do not print very > much. > > I do like the wider format of 3800, but can live with 2200. > > If staying with the 2200 is the best bang for the buck, than I would > appreciate the links for the software, inks, and the set-up for now. > > Thanx. > > James > Paul Thanx for the reply. I was wondering why you chose IJC over Quad for the software. I noticed a price difference. Is it like Photoshop Elements vs. CS2 or CS3? Also, since this is a hobby and I do not print large prints at this time, where or how would I get larger prints made? I would like to be economical and that was the reason I thought I can get color and larger prints with a 3800. Is there a way I can give all the info and settings like I would print to an inkjet and give to a printer (which one would you suggest?)?
Message
Re: Epson 2200 vs. 3800 is it worth the upgrade for a newbie?
2007-01-01 by jskimjskimjskim
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.