Just one clarification. Some, if not many, on this list are not so much interested in the longevity for 'fine art' as they are for family photos. Family photos are much more likely to handed down from generation to generation, and longevity would be very important. So, from this perspective it is not rot.
Tom Baker
Steve Gledhill <stephengledhill@...> wrote:
I know some of us are (rightly) obsessed with the longevity of our
prints. Here's and article entitled "A Load of Rot" from last week's
Sunday Telegraph in the UK which puts into perspective our concerns
about how long our works of art might last.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2006/11/26/svartdecay26.xml&page=1
Steve Gledhill
http://www.virtuallygrey.co.uk/
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] A Load of Rot ... !
2006-11-29 by Tom Baker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.