First things first. I'm branching this thread from "Comparing prints for that "3 dimensional quality"?" to "K7 Split Tones" > What I really want to try is the neutral shadows/sepia highlights. How > are you liking that. Is the split strong enough? To me that makes more > sense. Makes more sense to me too, but the sepia shadows/neutral highlights is very nice too. Thier split is much more subtle. Looks more like the Carbon Sepia inks from the PiezoTone line. Regarding the neutral shadows/sepia highlights, I can't say yet how strong the split looks in the 'wild'. So far, I've been mainly printing linearzation targets and tweak patches during the curve building process. The one real world image I've printed looks good WRT how strong the split is. I'll report back later in the week after we've printed more images. Bill has a portfolio he's chomping at the bit to print with these inks so the 7600 will see plenty of action this week. One thing for certain, the split is more apparent with neutral shadows/sepia highlights than with sepia shadows/neutral highlights. I did spend a fair amount of time fine tuning where exactly the tones transitioned. A person can dramatically change how strong the split appears by how they define the under inking. > How are you able to subdivide this and move from one configuration to > the other? Are you just using them as quads with a shared black or > what? I really want the whole 6 channels in what I'm doing (I think). Nope, full swap with the exception of channel 1, K. I really dig the smooth transitions of the K7 inks, so we'll be using all seven channels in each configuration. I've created a set of purge profiles for OPM to make the switching of carts easier. I'm finding that it takes more than just the two cleaning cycles to purge the lines. It's not a huge waste of ink, but two cleaning cycles hasn't done it for me. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
K7 Split Tones
2006-11-27 by Scott King
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.