John, The current hardware (Epson x800) is already capable of printing a least 10 bits of gray (1024 levels) with IP (based on my own tests with a spectro). Correct me if I am misquoting you Roy, but I think the point you are making is that human vision probably struggles to perceive any difference in images with more than 6 bits once you factor in PS dithering. Certainly without the dithering I think I can percieve more than 8 bits (around 9 bits) in a step wedge. I'll do some more testing with dithered vs non-dithered images to see if there are real world situations that the dithering doesn't handle well. Mike On 19/11/06, john dean <deanwork2003@...> wrote: > > Roy, > > I believe I understand most of what you are describing here. It seems > to confirm what you've said all along. > > I have two quick questions though. First, do you see the potential for > sofware rip advances that WILL allow us to gain output advantage in > sending bit depth larger than 8 bit to the printer in the near future? > And, second, are any of the new large format 12 channel pigment > machines that you've investigated addressing anything larger than 8 > bit capability already? > > I guess what I am getting at is IF a bit depth beyond 8 bit WAS > possible in the near future, would we be seeing this capability coming > from new software, new hardware, or a combination of the two designed > in conjunction with each other. > > John > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: # grays to send to the printer driver: 8 bit vs 16 bit
2006-11-19 by Michael King
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.