Digital BW, The Print

Roy covered the bases far more eloquently than I could have.



From: Steven Karafyllakis <stevekphoto@...>
Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 01:33:55 -0000
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: the times, they aren't a-changing-so can we start
over again?

 
 
 

Apologies if we're boring you, Steve, but this was never intended to be
a 16 vs 8 bit discussion. My original underlying question is would
capturing, processing and printing more shades of gray (at any bit
depth) result in a richer, more nuanced tonal range. Got anything to
contribute?

Steve Karafyllakis

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , Steve Kale
<stevekale@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> The 16 bit vs 8 bit at printing (rather than for image editing) broken
> record is back yet again.  That?s the problem with
> zombies...they....just...don?t...die!
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]