Hello Tyler, >OK, slithering back into my cave... Wait! Don't slither away yet. Got a few questions - You say these prints are from a scanned 5x7 neg. I'm wondering how much difference the two output methods would show on a scanned 35mm neg, or a digi file from an APS sized sensor? Would the detail that the quad printer shows here not be in the smaller images and therefore it would have nothing to resolve? Would like your thoughts on that. Are you planning to come back here at some point with a similar comparison using the new 3800? I'm really eager to see if that new dither will make much difference. Also same for the new HP printers. I forget the model, but I recently read a review of one that said something to the effect that the dots aren't laid down in rows so there can't be any dither banding. So I'm also eager to hear how those printers will be for BW. >For some strange reason I'm not that smart, I'm part of this >community and chose to remain for now... Maybe you're the smart one [ggg]. I hope you will continue to be visible and vocal and that the printer makers will continue to improve the out-of-the-box BW quality. I'm assuming that the new competition from Canon and HP will be good for us in the long run. K3 was a big step in the right direction and it really changed the landscape. Now let's have some more steps like that. Thanks for the report and your usual great input. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: the times, they aren't a-changing
2006-11-12 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.