Digital BW, The Print

Mike,

>I have been using a 1280 with the UT2 inset. 

>I can pick up a very lightly used 2200 for a good price. 

>What is the difference between the UT2 and UT7 inks?

They are very similar, but the cold toners are different and in different
positions.  The carbons are the same, thought he UT2 M & LM become UT7 C &
LC.

> Is the 2200 a good printer to work with?

Definitely.  I have the 4K+ inkset it mine now. (MK, PK, LK, & LLK plus LM
and 50% LC ("LLC"?), with yellow now in the Y position, but glop might go
there.)  This takes a rip -- QTR or IJC.  I'm using IJC because it's what I
know.  If you're into making your own profiles, I'd consider the 4K+
approach.  I really like it.  Not only do I have full Lab control, but the
carbon core (density) is independent of the hue.  So, control of tones is
very easy.  Right now, of course, there are not that many profiles.  See
http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/4K+.pdf  

> will there ever be spongeless carts for it?

The easy-refill sponge type that MIS has work fine.  I use them regularly.

> My other option is to wait for the 3800, ...

The 3800 looks like quite a machine.  I assume MIS inks can be used to
re-fill the Epson carts.  Then again, I'd want to sell some of those inks.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com