Ernst, The Polaroid was the first decent film scanner I bought (in 1999, I think). I have found it to be a very good scanner for B&W negs, and the graininess with silver-image B&W does seem to be a little lower than that produced by the Nikons. It is the only one of the bunch that I bought Silverfast for. I've found that I can rarely improve on the B&W scans I did with the Polaroid by using the Nikon 5000 for example. Maybe that just means that I've learned nothing in seven years. Best, Helen --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla <E.Dinkla@...> wrote: > > Helen Bach wrote: > > > I've been doing my trials with the > > Polaroid 4000, Nikon 4000, Nikon 8000, Nikon 5000, Nikon 9000 and > > lately the Imacon 949. > > Helen, > > the Polaroid 4000 may be the only one with a fluorescent tube > light source, the other ones all have more or less a point > light source I think. Is that correct ? And did you see a > different result with the Polaroid ? > > Ernst > > > -- > Ernst Dinkla > > > www.pigment-print.com > ( unvollendet ) >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Great Photographic Artists [was Scanning 35mm vs digital camer
2006-03-28 by Helen Bach
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.