I second Eric's recommendation. Filim and scanner is a lovely combination that produces beautiful results. And, if ever a better scanner comes on the market, you still have your film to rescan. When better cameras come on the market with digital, their old digital files are still what they are. NO chance for improvement with technology. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Eric Neilsen Photo 2" <e.neilsen2@...> wrote: > > One consideration is digital crashes, cards burn up, data gets corrupted. I > would stay with the film and do the scanner route. I just decided to get a > Nikon 9000 and keep shooting 35mm, and medium format. I can even make small > positives from my 4x5's that can be scanned by the medium format. I have > only had one camera poop out on me in the field preventing me from shooting > with it. I have seen some rather noisy original digital images. Once you > have the film processed it will be around for a long time. > > And if you want to make a silver print, you can. No film recorder, no white > film output with your inkjet. Just the sound of water running and a little > music playing ; ) > > And you can bring your old work with you into the new media. > > Film and scanner is my recommendation. > > Eric >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera
2006-03-25 by joshscapes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.