Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Scanning 35mm vs digital camera

2006-03-25 by joshscapes

I second Eric's recommendation.  Filim and scanner is a lovely 
combination that produces beautiful results.  And, if ever a better 
scanner comes on the market, you still have your film to rescan.  
When better cameras come on the market with digital, their old 
digital files are still what they are.  NO chance for improvement 
with technology.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Eric Neilsen 
Photo 2" <e.neilsen2@...> wrote:
>
> One consideration is digital crashes, cards burn up, data gets 
corrupted. I
> would stay with the film and do the scanner route. I just decided 
to get a
> Nikon 9000 and keep shooting 35mm, and medium format. I can even 
make small
> positives from my 4x5's that can be scanned by the medium format.  
I have
> only had one camera poop out on me in the field preventing me from 
shooting
> with it. I have seen some rather noisy original digital images. 
Once you
> have the film processed it will be around for a long time. 
> 
> And if you want to make a silver print, you can. No film recorder, 
no white
> film output with your inkjet. Just the sound of water running and 
a little
> music playing ; ) 
> 
> And you can bring your old work with you into the new media. 
> 
> Film and scanner is my recommendation. 
> 
> Eric
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.