Digital BW, The Print

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" 
<deanwork2003@...> wrote:
>
> 
> Like I said. I pray this time they are telling the truth, but we're
> not going to throw away our PMT scanners anytime soon and their 
track
> record is not good.
> 

Wouldn't it be nice if this were (finally) true? However, I'm not to 
terribly impressed with the 6400 ppi scans that Vincent did. The 4800 
ppi scans looked pretty good after he found the height adjusters, so 
maybe with the wet mount adapter we can get good 4800 ppi scans. That 
said I don't hold too much hope for the claimed 6400 ppi resolution. 
But I guess we will find out when someone gets one (hopefully 
Vincent) as the reviews at photo-i are fairly level, and at least 
provide enough data and images to make up my own mind, not the always 
crumby all glowing and shiny lights type reviews that are so common.