That's a good point, thanks Josh. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "joshhackney" <joshhackney@...> wrote: > > > I think rolls are more expensive in nearly every paper, and 8.5x11 is almost always the > cheapest. Makes sense. The paper manufacturer needs to have 40-100 feet of defect free > paper to sell a roll. > > Josh > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, G Guhan Gunaratnam > <guruguhan@> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I was looking at Moab papers at a local store online today (vistek.com) and > > they are carrying Kayenta 13"x19" (50sheets) for US$62.00 ($72CDN) and > > 13"x50' rolls for US$53 ($62CDN). Getting the sheets is cheaper. Is it > > just with this store, or is this generally the case. If one generally > > sticks to standard paper sizes, are the sheets a better choice then? > > > > I had thought that buying in roll form had two advantages, one being the > > freedom of varied widths for various situations, the other being cost > > savings (I thought it was equivalent to buying in bulk). Is this the case? > > > > Guhan > > >
Message
Re: Why use Roll Paper in this situation?
2006-03-19 by gguhangunaratnam
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.