Not all manufacturers care about defects. Breathing Color routinely sends me rolls of dirty canvas. On Mar 18, 2006, at 1:48 PM, joshhackney wrote: > > I think rolls are more expensive in nearly every paper, and 8.5x11 > is almost always the > cheapest. Makes sense. The paper manufacturer needs to have > 40-100 feet of defect free > paper to sell a roll. > > Josh > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, G Guhan > Gunaratnam > <guruguhan@...> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I was looking at Moab papers at a local store online today >> (vistek.com) and >> they are carrying Kayenta 13"x19" (50sheets) for US$62.00 ($72CDN) >> and >> 13"x50' rolls for US$53 ($62CDN). Getting the sheets is cheaper. >> Is it >> just with this store, or is this generally the case. If one >> generally >> sticks to standard paper sizes, are the sheets a better choice then? >> >> I had thought that buying in roll form had two advantages, one >> being the >> freedom of varied widths for various situations, the other being cost >> savings (I thought it was equivalent to buying in bulk). Is this >> the case? >> >> Guhan >>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Why use Roll Paper in this situation?
2006-03-18 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.