David Sinai wrote about differences he has seen between small black-only prints he's made from his own 20D exposures and small black-only prints he's made from FSA scans of large-format film. I happened to see David's post just before I saw Erwin Puts's recent article, at <http://www.imx.nl/photosite/comments/c023.html>, about how size matters, whether it is the size of film, 35mm vs. medium format, or the size of the digital sensor, 20D vs. 5D. For the film comparison, Erwin Puts relies on Crawley's 1993 article. For the sensor comparison, Puts does his own tests. He concludes that differences in size still matter, contrary to Phil Askey's comparitive conclusions near the end of his dpeview.com review of Nikon's D200. I'm not sure how relevant Erwin Puts work is to David's conjectures about other possibilities, but I think it does give David another conjecture to consider, and one that might be easier to test. -- Sam
Message
Re: [Digital BW] BO Prints: Digital Image Capture vs. Film
2006-03-16 by Sam McCandless
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.