The target should not have had an embedded profile - which target are you using? You were right to print it without colour management. Using the ICC profile allows independence from your choice of workspace but personally I would use GG2.2. DG20 does not lead to "more open lower print values" except by coincidence in a non colour managed workflow. > From: Peter De Smidt <pdesmidt@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:05:40 -0800 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Paul's Recommended BW Workspace > > So with all of the good info presented by Paul and others, I made my > first grayscale ICC today. I printed Paul's 21 step stepwedge (with > 2.20 max density, as that's what I get with my R2400 and EPSM). I > noticed that the profile embedded with the file is grayscale 2.2. I > have been using Dot Gain 20%, as I've heard that it leads to more 'open' > lower print values. I didn't color manage the stepwedge. (That was the > right thing to do, right?) Should I change my working space to 2.2 when > I use the ICC? > > BTW I used my MacBeth 914 reflection densitometer and coverted the > visual density to L* via a formula.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Paul's Recommended BW Workspace
2006-03-13 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.