--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Gledhill <stephengledhill@...> wrote: > > After a few more prints I've now seen how susceptible to abrasion of the > surface the PermaJet Fibre Base Gloss is. When feeding A3 paper from > the tray the first few inches of the surface have light scuff marks as > the roller picks up the paper - on my 4800. I had adjusted the printer > for the thicker paper so was surprised to see this. When fed from the > rear there is no scuffing. This is the first of the heavier papers that > I've used so what I'm reporting may be a problem with other thicker > papers too - anyone? But it is very disappointing to have to feed > manually - or use a roll. I didn't see this on the 4 sheets of Crane > Museo Silver Rag that I got my hands on - its weight is almost the same > as the PermaJet. Steve, I had exactly the same problem with Da Vinci Fibre Gloss (which, we have been led to believe, is the same paper, made by Innova) in my Epson 2100/2200. When feeding A4 sized sheets via the normal feed path, there is a squealing noise (like tyre squeal when a car tyre spins on acceleration) before the paper is picked up by the rollers. This problem was reduced by cleaning the rollers - BTW I'd previously been using Hahnemuhle Photo Rag which I think leaves some dust on the rollers, reducing their effectiveness. When the problem occurs there are very clear scuff marks where the rollers have been spinning against the paper. I've never had this problem with any non-matte paper I've used before. I too didn't want to use the rear feed slot so relied on keeping the rollers clean. I've given up with this paper anyway, because the results with Epson UC inks in the 2100/2200 are nothing special anyway. Can't get dark enough blacks (see earlier posts regarding L* values with PSG media setting at 2880 dpi). Regards, Alan
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Comparison of PermaJet Fibre Base Gloss with Crane Museo Silver
2006-03-06 by alanrew42
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.