R2400 v R1800 The R2400 and R1800 are from the same mould, i.e. they look the same. The R1800 targets the consumer market, whereas the R2400 is for the professional market. The R1800 uses a gloss optimizer to add the extra gloss to glossy media. The R2400 uses high gloss UltraChrome K3 inks to add a glossy look. This works up to a point nevertheless the gloss optimizer produces better results. Colour wise both printers are producing near identical results, there is not much in it. When it comes to monochrome (greyscale, b/w) then the R2400 is in a class of its own. The b/w prints from the R2400 are simply stunning. The only printer that can match this b/w quality is the HP 8750/8450 printers with their dedicated Photo black cartridge. The R2400 has better yellows, but at the expense of the blues whereas the R1800 has better red and orange, but the green is less pronounced. Both printers offer good value for money, the R2400 is more expensive, but has the K3 inks. The R1800 has CD/DVD printing - which feature do you value the most? "The EPSON Stylus Photo R2400 doesn't compete with traditional wet chemistry photographs - it doesn't need to as it is streets ahead of anything I have seen produced in a darkroom". In print quality terms, the R2400 has produced the best prints I have seen from any inkjet printer. The colours are vibrant and jump off the page. At twice the cost of R1800, here in the UK, that the kind of result I would expect for the money. For a full comprehensive review of the R2400 go to http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Epson%20R2400/page-1.htm
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 4800 vs. 2400 question
2006-02-04 by Barrington Maye
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.