And who would be happy with a Wilhelm stop value of a fade of 30%? I'd consider a print to have "faded" well before then. > From: Bob Frost <bob@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:25:14 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: more paper news > > Clayton, > > I don't think you should use the word 'archival' in the same sentence as > windowsill fading. Archives of prints etc are usually kept in the dark, > where totally different things are responsible for fading!! > > The whole subject is a mess! > > Bob Frost. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Clayton Jones" <cj@...> > > I think Shilesh's test was very revealing. Anything that would fade > on a windowsill in 4 weeks should not be considered archival.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: more paper news
2006-01-30 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.