> The goal, when development started, was to build profiles equivalent to what
> SpectroPRO built; but as we added features (high bit profiles, more patches to
> the single page target, etc) and as the firmware and calibration functions of
> the beta hardware developed, I began to notice that it was no longer a matter
> of whether PrintFIX PRO built profiles as good as SpectroPRO had, they were
> consistantly better. So we exceeded our target goal of easier, more convenient,
> faster, cheaper, with equivalent results... by getting better results.
>
> C. David Tobie
David,
The quality now falling somewhere between
ProfilerPro+Spectrometer and SpectroPro ?
What wonders me a bit is the name of the PrintFix Pro. The
nice feature of PrintFix was the automatic
measuring. Though the quality of PrintFix Pro profiles will be
better, the task of measuring isn't more convenient etc than
what PrintFix has. Any plans for the future to make an
integrated system again but this time with the
spectrocolorimeter internals ?
Ernst
--
Ernst Dinkla
www.pigment-print.com
( unvollendet )Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: PrintFIX Pro info & review
2006-01-18 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.