I definitely think the bulk of the issue is the calibration charts were printed with a 100% ink load which as I noted is way too much for this black ink. So I then ran the EPSG 21-step greyscale image I had printed under the tap - the GG1.8 one. These were printed with the Epson driver. (The EPSG showed the run-off the most, indicating the issue was more likely excess ink.) Only the 95 and 100 patches showed bleed (the 95 barely). Interestingly, the text which should be 100% K did not show any bleed even looking through a loupe. With HPR, the 100 patch showed very very minor bleed (even the 95 GG2.2 patch did not). Of course for B&W I can run QTR and manage ink loads - although I am not sure about toning given the cool LK and the fact that I like warm-toned prints - but for colour I'm not sure I want to have to invest in a RIP. I'm hoping they, or their successors, will "behave" with the Epson driver as well. > From: Greg <dfaprinting@...> > > > Thanks. You might try some extra limiting with QTR to see if the run > off was just from too much ink, which can happen even with Eboni, or > the inks that I use. Yes, I'm trying to remain positive about these new > inks, and give them a fair chance at life. > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Initial Nanochrome Testing
2006-01-12 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.