On Jan 5, 2006, at 10:53 AM, William John Smith wrote: > If you really want to protect and trace your images there is Digimarc. > http://www.digimarc.com/ > Adobe has been pushing it for years, it does cost. I don't know of > anyone who has used it, anyone out there? I have for years through two employers; Digimarc does *not* protect images, it tags them to enable later (forensic) identification; there's also a spidering service that attempts to locate your DigiMarc'ed images if they are found on public sites that the service spiders. Protection would imply some proactive method of preventing inappropriate use; DigiMarc'ed images are *just* as easy to steal off a web page as any other JPEG. We currently only use it as a means to identify sites that are inappropriately reproducing our imagery; the reports go to a lawyer who assesses the use, and if inappropriate sends a letter asking them to remove it, or at least change how it is presented. -R
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT: Copyright protection of images on a webpage
2006-01-05 by Roger Howard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.