Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Film vs Digital

2005-12-08 by djon43

Some aren't going transition for a while, if ever, because current
concepts should be retired within in a year or two. After all, who
wants to get stuck with $10,000 worth of antiquated EOS or Nikon
digital SLR concept?

One reported factor should be the new concave chip from Kodak et
al...higher-than-10MP resolution, designed specifically to facilitate
much smaller cameras and lenses: allegedly Leica's perpetually-pending
digital M, which would involve Panasonic.
 
Another is Konica/Minolta/Sony's alliance, which is about to produce a
much higher resolution, image stabalized digital SLR as well.

Why "go digital" just because it's available? If one's happy with
one's film strategy, why change? Perhaps one would move instead to a
larger or smaller film format, just for the aesthetics. Or perhaps one
would rather move from B&W prints to B&W videos? :-)


> A 16megapixel camera gives an 8bit RGB file of around 48MB.
> 
> Stop being a diehard !
> 
> TonyR
> 
> 
>  On 08/12/2005 11:15:06, garethjolly wrote:
> > I'll confess, I'm a film die hard.
> > 
> > But I recently saw a very impressive print from a Canon 16
megapixel SLR.
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.