Some aren't going transition for a while, if ever, because current concepts should be retired within in a year or two. After all, who wants to get stuck with $10,000 worth of antiquated EOS or Nikon digital SLR concept? One reported factor should be the new concave chip from Kodak et al...higher-than-10MP resolution, designed specifically to facilitate much smaller cameras and lenses: allegedly Leica's perpetually-pending digital M, which would involve Panasonic. Another is Konica/Minolta/Sony's alliance, which is about to produce a much higher resolution, image stabalized digital SLR as well. Why "go digital" just because it's available? If one's happy with one's film strategy, why change? Perhaps one would move instead to a larger or smaller film format, just for the aesthetics. Or perhaps one would rather move from B&W prints to B&W videos? :-) > A 16megapixel camera gives an 8bit RGB file of around 48MB. > > Stop being a diehard ! > > TonyR > > > On 08/12/2005 11:15:06, garethjolly wrote: > > I'll confess, I'm a film die hard. > > > > But I recently saw a very impressive print from a Canon 16 megapixel SLR. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Film vs Digital
2005-12-08 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.